This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM-Cover-Top-240714.jpg
Categories:Advisers,Regulation

FSCS gets 24 claims against Ucis firm fighting ban

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has received 24 claims against an adviser firm which is appealing against an FSA ban over the misselling of unregulated collective investment schemes.

In a decision notice issued in November, the FSA is seeking to ban Bath IFA Pave Financial Management and its directors Timothy Pattison and Stephen Hocking over the investment of £9.7m in Ucis.

The FSA also wants to fine Pattison £90,000. Pave, Pattison and Hocking have referred the matter to the Upper Tribunal and a hearing date has not yet been scheduled.

The FSCS claims relate to investments in illiquid property funds and Arch cru. It has not yet declared the firm in default.

An FSCS spokesman says: “Establishing the eligibility of the claims could be difficult as a number relate to Arch cru funds or illiquid property fund claims, where we will have to value the fund for compensation purposes. Both of these could take time.”

The FSA says 65 of Pave’s 200 clients were advised to invest up to 80 per cent of their investment portfolio in Ucis. Others were advised to switch existing pensions into Sipps, where the underlying investments included a high concentrations of Ucis.

Attain Wealth Management managing director Gordon Crothers says: “There are advisers that just see the headline rates of return on Ucis.”

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Another firm thinking it could find the 'silver bullet'. And yet another firm that'll dump it's liabilities on the FSCS (you and me!)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

The Cost of Advice

Sponsored by Brooks Macdonald

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Do you think advisers will benefit from Chancellor George Osborne's guidance guarantee?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments