FSA told to improve "inadequate" call records

The Complaints Commissioner has told the FSA to improve its call records after the regulator could not trace a call in which a customer rang to check if a firm was reputable and subsequently lost £20,000.

In a letter to a complainant from the Complaints Commissioner published by the FSA yesterday the Commissioner criticises the FSA for its “wholly inadequate” notes, and says it is unacceptable that call records could not be found.

The letter reveals that a customer filed a complaint against the FSA after a money transfer went wrong last August.

The customer wanted to change £20,000 into US dollars then transfer it electronically to their US bank.

The customer chose a money transfer firm, referred to in the letter as Firm A, and then phoned the FSA to establish if the firm was reputable.

Based on the information the FSA provided the customer went ahead with the transaction, but before the transfer was completed the firm went into administration and the customer lost the £20,000.

The commissioner did not uphold the complaint as he judged the information given by the FSA, that the firm was registered with the regulator, was correct. The FSA cannot provide information about whether a firm is solvent or how it conducts its business.

But he did call for the FSA to review its procedures for retrieving calls and to improve record keeping.

The FSA no longer held the call recording, and only held a short note saying the firm was authorised. The firm was in fact ’registered’ with the FSA rather than authorised.

In the letter Complaints Commissioner Sir Anthony Holland said: “In this case, a call was clearly made to the FSA’s consumer contact centre and the operative recorded notes of the call recorded on its central system. It is unclear why when the complaints team asked for details of the call, on numerous occasions, it was not possible to retrieve these notes. This is clearly an unacceptable situation.”

Holland said the notes that were eventually found did not accurately record what was discussed in a five minute conversation.

He added: “The notes of the call taken by the consumer contact centre were wholly inadequate. This is unacceptable and the FSA should take steps to improve its record keeping.”

Holland also called for the FSA’s contact centre to set out clearly to customers how their money is protected and the situations where their money is at risk.

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and

Readers' comments (3)

  • If this had been an IFA, the FSA would have been rubbing their hands with glee. Another fine to enhance their already large salaries etc.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If we were to make a list of other matters on which the Regulator needs to improve, we'd end up with a tome about the size of their so called CP's

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What is the point of having a regulator who, when asked if a particular company is reputable, is unable to answer such a basic enquiry?
    Confirming that the firm is duly FSA 'registered' suggests, in the public mind, that the firm is properly regulated and authorised.
    As we are all too well aware even when a firm is fully 'FSA Regulated' this affords little protection for even such basic transactions as a money transfer.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Should there be an RDR consumer awareness campaign?

Current Issue