This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

FSA simplified advice guidance delayed

  • Print
  • Comments (14)

The FSA has delayed its simplified advice guidance and will only now commit to publishing it later this year.

In March, FSA chief executive Hector Sants told the Treasury select committee the regulator was committed to publishing a paper on simplified advice by the summer. He was responding to concerns from MPs that adviser firms and providers did not have enough guidance on the regulator’s view of simplified advice services ahead of the retail distribution review deadlines.

Sants told the committee: “We are committed to publishing a further paper in summer, or earlier if we can, in which we hope to give firms the certainty they need in respect of the regulatory questions to enable them to deliver the service.”

An FSA spokeswoman now says the guidance will be published “later this year”.

The FSA has previously stated there was no need to delay the RDR if its simplified advice regime was not implemented until after January 1, 2013.

The British Bankers’ Association and the Association of British insurers have both been heavily lobbying the FSA to introduce a simplified advice regime. Last year, the FSA indicated that advisers operating in a simplified advice environment would not need to obtain QCF level four qualifications.

Earlier this month, the FSA delayed its decision on whether to ban cash rebates paid by platforms to clients and payments between providers and platforms and is expected to publish a guidance consultation on legacy commission later this year.

Barretts Financial Solutions senior partner Kim Barrett says: “This is extremely frustrating. The FSA is dragging advisers through radical changes and yet it is the regulator that is not ready for them.”

Concept Financial Planning managing director Paul Richardson says: “Clarity on simplified advice should have been published already. The FSA has not recognised how important this issue is.”


  • Print
  • Comments (14)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (14)

  • Not THAT simple, then?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just another item to add to the list of failures of not just 'the regulator', but he who must take responsibility and become accountable - but will he??

    A disgrace to state to a select committee as was and then casually fail. Stand up and be counted Hector as you expect us to do every working day of our lives. Have you no shame about everything you fail to achieve???

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is so important, yet we seem to be having some heel dragging going on. I am most concerned that "ordinary people" will be scared off by the concept of fee payment after RDR, but we do not yet have a viable alternative. This issue needs to be addressed - quickly, so that we know where everyone stands.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Simplified advice is too complicated for the FSA. What a surprise.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Concerned" - you should be terrified. I have worked in the " Fee Market " for mortgage advice for a good number of years now. The only way I get my Fee is by "irrevocable " mandate to solicitor and even then its a fight. How you going to get your fee for a pension transfer? Don't think you will, and how are you going to make up for the lost income?, don't think you will....
    For too masny brokers/Ifa's the wake up call is too late

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As I have mentioned before in another article, they have not signed off CII to sign off the GAP Fill to become Level 4, which to me does not seem a big thing. So how can we expect them to do the bigger things, like Platform stuff, Simplified Advice, TCF-RDR, regulate Banks, stop Equittable Life falling over, growth of ex Building Societies into areas they could not manage or sustain. Perhaps the TSC should explain Decisions and Detail are interconnected, otherwise a timescale with only a Decision, is not effective, unless the Detail has the same timescale.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Boy am I exasperated....

    Simply exasperated I am...

    Does "Simplified Advice" involve "Simplified Regulation"?

    Not according to the regulators!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The definition of simplifioed advice should be simple !!

    what a naive comment - it actually means different things to different people.

    To me simplified advice means a client who does not seek financial planning, but seeks advice in an area of their own selection - for example "we have just had our firts child and need to arrange some family protection" so I will not tell them that I believe (if I do) that pensions are much more important - I will restrict my advice to helping specify the selection of policy and sourcing that spec of policy. I wuill make it clear that there may be other prioroties tha i may believe they should be considering or that I believe ar more important. and that my financial advice service is available for a fee. But I will respond to the brief that I have been given.

    Like most IFA's i have attented various seminars on the RDR and some with an FSA "guest star speaker" - I have quizzed every one on the various qualities of sevrice an IFA can give, including my defintion of "simplified advice" - I don't know if any of them understood the "simple" question I was asking as to how this would fit in under the RDR. The standard answer has been "we will have to consider tha and all will become clear as the deadline approaches". Clearly clearl has a new definition - as clear as mud !!.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Instead of the FSA calling this the simplified advice and guidance, why does the FSA not call it by its real name the Bankers Charter to rip people off!

    Large insurance companies and banks have been responsible for the line share of complaints but the FSA is continually trying to come up with so-called opt outs of the RDR process for these organisations. So what will be left with is banks selling more a more structured products by sales people posing as financial advisers (no change there then).

    I recently published this on another money marketing piece and I think that this is relevant to this conversation as well:

    The only thing I want to know is why is it, that it is always a small mortgage broker or IFA practice that gets banned for life and a prison sentence, where are the Bank Directors, who have been caught managing firms that have been giving wrong advice and in some cases arguably fraud on a mass scale. PPI insurance mis-selling is going to cost the financial services industry an estimated 3 billion and that's the people that actually claim.

    Isn't it about time that the FSA starts to regulate financial services properly and treat all financial services firms in the same way and that includes prosecuting Bank Directors when their firms are found to be breaking rules or clearly found doing things wrong.

    At present all Bank Directors seem to have immunity from prosecution, as they always have the defence that they are too far away from the individual responsibility. If a firm is so big that those Senior Directors and Executives cannot take responsibility for what happens under their watch then surely that firm is too big and should be broken up.

    Massive bonuses comes with massive responsibility and if you can't take responsibility for your organisation's mistakes then you should not be in the job.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Having attended a seminar by the FSA many advisors were miffed at the thought that you could have simple advisors and more complicated advisors operating out of the same business.

    They have finally realised that the bulk of people do not all need complicated advice but as someone previously has said, a plan/product/bit of advice to cover what their specific issue is.

    However, the FSA have not got a clue as to how that is to be delivered hence the stalling.

    The insurance companies and banks must be hating this as it is not going to give them time to prepare their onslaught onto the market.

    What a cruel world!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Do you see the value in adviser trade bodies?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments