FSA signals re-reg crackdown
The FSA has signalled it is looking to crack down on platforms that do not allow the re-registration of assets.

In a speech yesterday in Luxembourg, FSA director of conduct policy Sheila Nicoll sounded a warning shot to the platform industry to tackle re-registration issues, which she said were causing poor outcomes for consumers and presenting a potential barrier to new entrants.
She said that re-registration has been an issue in the UK for a number of years as many platforms do not allow customers to re-register holdings off their platform.
Nicoll said that where re-registration is not available, customers have to sell and repurchase holdings if they want to move them elsewhere which could cause a tax liability.
Nicoll said that as a result of some platforms not allowing re-registration, “customers and their advisers may find it more difficult, or even impractical, to transfer assets to another service provider”.
She said: “Some may even be put off by the hurdles without investigating the practicalities of a transfer.”
She added: “This is a poor outcome, as customers should be able to transfer their assets elsewhere if they are no longer satisfied with the service they receive.
“The lack of re-registration also presents a potential barrier to new entrants to the platform market and we will be discussing the options available to us to correct this poor outcome.”
Nicoll also said the FSA is looking at ways of ensuring that platforms do not become a channel which providers use to continue paying commission to advisers.
She also said the FSA does not want to see platforms offering incentives to move investments unnecessarily between platforms, especially if consumers incur extra charges.
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing
View results 10 per page | 20 per page





Readers' comments (14)
Kelman Chambers | 26 Mar 2010 10:01 am
About time! It should be mandatory. Any platform not allowing it should be put out of business until they change their ways.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
neil franklin | 26 Mar 2010 10:04 am
As usual the FSA are years behind the times but better late than ever. After all clients should be enabled to reregister!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26 Mar 2010 10:06 am
The sooner the ability to reregister is compulsory the better. Without it TCF is just not happening
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26 Mar 2010 10:08 am
It makes no comment about how soon the FSA intend to implement changes to allow full re-registration of assets. You can bet that it won't happen overnight
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26 Mar 2010 10:18 am
At last - the FSA are making sense. Cofunds please take note!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Neil F Liversidge | 26 Mar 2010 10:22 am
Credit where it's due, Nice one Sheila, well done FSA. Hope the outbreak of reality continues apace!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26 Mar 2010 10:35 am
Who currently offers re-registrations with no restrictions?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 26 Mar 2010 10:41 am
Great to see the FSA wasting money sending people to luxembourg.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
martin broomfield | 26 Mar 2010 10:50 am
Novia offer re-registration on and off our full wrap platform without restriction
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Captain Cynic | 26 Mar 2010 10:52 am
Mmmmmm...
Yes, the FSA are slow to back what the adviser community has been saying all along but I, Captain Cynic, would suggest that they are only saying it now because the culprits are recognising they have to change anyway.
Maybe the buddy network has authorised Sheila's comments, maybe not; but the lack of commitment to timetables just smacks of words without substance again.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment