FSA fines mortgage lender £42,000

The FSA has fined mortgage lender Bridging Loans £42,000 and its director Joseph Cummings £70,000 for serious failures relating to lending practices and for failing to treat customers fairly in arrears.

The FSA has also banned Joseph Cummings and taken action to prevent three other directors at the firm, Miriam Cummings, Laura Cummings and Susan Cummings, from being able to operate in senior positions within the financial services industry.

Whilst in charge of Bridging Loans, Cummings failed to act with integrity by knowingly misleading a customer. He also assessed customers’ complaints based on his perception of their character, without properly reviewing their circumstances, branding some customers “evil”.   

As an approved person, Cummings also failed to act appropriately when dealing with customers entering mortgage contracts or when handling customers’ complaints and subsequently, in his treatment of customers in arrears.

He failed to ensure charges and interest were attributed accurately and fairly to customers’ accounts, with charges allocated inconsistently and with some customers paying excessive charges.

The FSA says Cummings also tried to deter customers from complaining or seeking redress by threatening to charge a customer for time spent dealing with their account when they complained to the ombudsman or refusing to deal with a customer unless they withdrew their complaint to the ombudsman.

Cummings also acted recklessly by failing to properly assess a third party underwriter who acted as a customer facing broker and was the sole source of information upon which the firm assessed 63 FSA regulated loan applications. Given the underwriter financially gained from each loan, this created a conflict of interest.

Cummings refused to co operate with the FSA during the course of the investigation, including denying the FSA access to Bridging Loans’ office.   

Miriam Cummings has been banned from performing any controlled function at a firm, while Laura Cummings and Susan Cummings have been banned from undertaking any significant influence function at a financial services firm in the future.

All three became approved persons holding significant influence functions at Bridging Loans when, in reality, they had had no meaningful involvement in the business, resulting in customers being lent to irresponsibly and the unfair treatment of customers in arrears.

Bridging Loans has agreed not to conduct new FSA regulated mortgage business and the FSA has taken action to ensure that it cannot repossess or sell the homes of any of its FSA regulated mortgage customers. Bridging Loans has also agreed to provide redress to customers who have been adversely affected by its misconduct.

This is the first time the FSA has taken action against a mortgage lender’s senior management concerning irresponsible lending and unfair practices in respect of dealing with customers in arrears.  

FSA director of enforcement and financial crime Margaret Cole (pictured) says: “Joseph Cummings showed total disregard for the interests of Bridging Loans’ customers, basing his decisions and subsequent treatment of a customer on whether or not he liked or trusted them, rather than on any proper assessment of their circumstances.  

“This sort of behaviour towards customers cannot be tolerated and the FSA will continue to take action where necessary against firms that fail to have the proper systems and controls in place to ensure customers are being treated fairly.”

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and

Readers' comments (5)

  • I'd say they all gor off pretty lightly. This guy should, at the very least, be detained at her majesty's pleasure.
    The sort of people who perpetuate the myth that we're all rogues.
    Surely they should all be banned from having anything to do with financial services period, as opposed to 'any significant influence function at a financial services firm in the future'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Neil Wright says: "This guy should, at the very least, be detained at her majesty's pleasure."

    This maybe so Neil but to be detained at her majesty's pleasure would requirev natural justice or procedural fairness via the the courts and I doubt that the quasi judicial authority vested in the FSA comes anywhere near this standard. Policing is always easy in a police state and vesting such powers in the FSA without constraint is very dangerous. FSA director of enforcement and financial crime Margaret Cole is a top lawyer but she is not a top judge, jury and executioner. These powers are unconstitutional and perhaps illegal.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agree with Anon @ 11.57. What they did was immoral but was it illegal?
    Agree with Neil that firms like this give us all a bad name and that we are better off without them.
    Detained at her Majesty's pleasure - that should be the sole preserve of a court, not an unelected quango.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The FSA routinely shows total disregard for the interests of its customers (we, the Great Regulated Unwashed), basing its decisions and subsequent treatment of us on whether or not they like or trust us, rather than on any proper assessment of our circumstances, business model, experience and track record.

    This sort of behaviour towards us cannot be tolerated but unfortunately the FSA is above, beyond and exempt from the Laws of the Land by which the rest of us have to abide, so for now there's not much most of us can do about.

    But times they are a changin' and one day the monster will be vanquished.

    P.S. This is not in any way to condone the actions of Bridging Loans ~ I just felt like having a pop at the FSA as it's a bit quiet this afternoon.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not like Julian to have a pop at FSA! Actually, I get so used to reading his letters in the pinks I nearly fell off my chair when I opened Money Marketing the other week and he was not published. I felt like ringing him up to make sure he was ok.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Should there be an RDR consumer awareness campaign?

Current Issue