This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+301014+small
Categories:Regulation

FSA fines former Greenlight Capital compliance officer £130k

  • Print
  • Comments (6)

The FSA has fined Greenlight Capital trader and compliance officer Alexander Ten-Holter £130,000 for failing to make “reasonable” enquiries before being ordered to sell the firm’s shareholding in Punch Taverns.

The regulator has also banned Ten-Holter from performing compliance and oversight and money laundering reporting functions, after the regulator found he had not made any enquiries into whether the call had been made because of the receipt of insider information.

It has also fined Caspar Agnew, a trading desk director at JP Morgan Cazenove, £65,000 for failing to identify and act on a suspicious order from Greenlight to sell Punch shares that allowed the firm to be used to facilitate insider dealing or market abuse. The FSA says as a result of Agnew’s failings JP Morgan failed to identify the trade as suspicious and report it to the FSA.

On Wednesday, the regulator fined David Einhorn, the owner of the US hedge fund Greenlight Capital and his fund £7.2m for engaging in market abuse.

On June 9 2009, Ten-Holter received an order to sell Greenlight’s entire shareholding in Punch despite being made aware that Greenlight had spoken to Punch management minutes before its decision to sell.

The Greenlight analyst who gave the sell order told Ten-Holter that Punch management would have told them “secret bad things” had they signed a confidentiality agreement and the analyst thought that Greenlight had a potential one week window before the stock plummets. The FSA says this should have alerted Ten-Holter to the risk that Greenlight may have received inside information.

The FSA says Ten-Holter took no steps to satisfy himself that the order was not based on inside information, despite a clear indication that it was.

On June 15 2009, Punch announced a fund raising of £375m. Following the announcement, Punch’s shares fell by 29.9 per cent. Greenlight’s trading had avoided losses of approximately £5.8m for the funds under Greenlight’s management.

Agnew’s misconduct related to his dealings with Greenlight between June 9-12 2009, when he was instructed by Ten-Holter to sell 11.4m Punch shares, which constituted over 4 per cent of its issued share capital.

The FSA says Agnew failed to “act with due skill, care and diligence” and failed to alert JP Morgan Cazenove to the possibility that the trade was being conducted on the basis of inside information. Agnew thought that Greenlight was simply fortunate in its timing of its transactions.

FSA acting director of enforcement and financial crime Tracey McDermott says: “Ten-Holter’s approach to compliance oversight was wholly inadequate. Serious compliance failures of this nature can have a dramatic effect on the orderliness and integrity of the markets. Agnew was an experienced trader, so should have been suspicious of this transaction and aware of his responsibilities to report it.

“Tackling market abuse and insider dealing is not just an issue for the regulator. Compliance professionals and staff on sales and trading desks play a key role in assisting the FSA in detecting and preventing market abuse.”

A Greenlight spokesman says: “Alex is a valued member of the Greenlight team and our trader in the UK.  We believe that the FSA’s action against him is unwarranted.  He has our full support.”

  • Print
  • Comments (6)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (6)

  • I might be thick, but should these issues not have been the subject of court action, not summary fines?

    There are laws to prevent the abuse of due process and this does not seem to accord with the law of the land, how has the regulator acquired such powers without trial?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This seems desperately unfair. The intellectual climate at the time meant that these individuals attention was taken up with other matters such as Treating Customers Fairly and the RDR. They really cannot be held responsible.

    Whoops! Sorry - that's the FSA script about them missing the minor issue of a collapse of RBS whilst they were peeing about with other things.

    Have any of the FSA's board been fined £65,000 or £130,000 for their mistakes. No - thought not.

    They are entirely without moral credibility.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Chippy - im sorry so whats the alternative - the regulator should have just overlooked this point? Its a breach of regulation and more-over the law of the land.

    Im sorry but the decision here appears to be right, an example has been made to the rest of us.

    I feel everyone is so p**sed off with the regulator all the time sometimes they completely miss the point.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hi Big Ears,

    I agree with you. I think the regulator may have acted correctly in this case.

    The point I was trying to make, probably clumsily, was that the regulator completely lacks any moral authority because of its failure to apply the same standards to itself as it does to others.

    No doubt the regimes of Saddam Hussain and Gadaffi did many great things but they still did them without any moral authority or support because they were above the law and treated others so poorly.

    Until the FSA starts to apply its own standards to itself, whatever they do they will be judged harshly by all because they walk all over those they regulate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Am I hallucinating or are Chippy Minton and Big Ears really having a discussion about financial services regulation?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why has this never happened to any of the chief executives of banks?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Should Sesame unwind the 'pay to play' deals it set up as part of its restricted advice panel?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments