This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

FSA annual costs up by 16%, MAS budget doubles to £87m

  • Print
  • Comments (19)

The FSA has proposed to hike its annual costs by 15.6 per cent from £500.5m for 2011/12 to £578.4m for 2012/13.

This follows a 10 per cent increase last year.

The FSA has published its consultation paper on fees and levies for 2012/13 today.

It shows that despite the overall increase, fees for advisers not holding client money have fallen by 3 per cent from a total of £39.7m to £38.4m.

Fees for advisers holding client money have dropped 19 per cent from a total of £49.7m to £40.2m.

However fees for life insurers have gone up 37 per cent from £44.5m to £61.1m. Fees for fund managers have also jumped 32 per cent from £28.2m to £37.3m.

The paper also reveals the total Money Advice Service budget for 2012/13 has doubled from £43.7m for 2011/12 to £86.8m in 2012/13.

The FSA says this reflects the decision by the Government to move debt advice to the MAS.

Out of the total £86.8m budget £46.3m will deliver ’money advice’ while £40.5m will be allocated to debt advice. Advisers will continue to pay for the MAS’ financial capability remit as they did before, and the debt advice element of the service will be funded by banks, building societies and lenders.

FSA chief executive Hector Sants says: “The year to April 2013 is expected to be a challenging one for the FSA.  We will be moving to a twin peaks model internally ahead of the split into the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority, whilst at the same time continuing to focus on our supervisory role in a very difficult economic environment.  We are mindful of any increase in costs to industry and have continued to maintain headcount and keep core operating costs in line with inflation.”

MAS chief executive Tony Hobman says: “The MAS was set up to address one of the nation’s endemic problems: poor understanding and management of personal finances. It is a unique service that provides free, practical advice to people who need to get to grips with their money.

“We have come a long way, but there is a lot more to do. We are highly ambitious for the service in 2012/13 and beyond, to achieve our vision to enhance people’s lives because they take control of their money as a matter of course”.

The FSA published a consultation paper in October which proposed an overhaul to the way adviser firms’ fees are calculated from the number of approved persons to a firm’s income. If implemented, this will come into effect for 2013/14.

The figures published today indicate the level of regulatory fees and levies firms are likely to pay for the next year. The final figures will be published later in the year.

Proposed regulatory fees for A-D fee blocks for 2012/13:

  • Print
  • Comments (19)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (19)

  • Where's Cameron, we need protecting from this arrogance!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I will be standing on Putney High Street rattling a collection tin. All donations gratefully received.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mr Cameron is far to busy to deal with this matter at this time, he has more important issues such as dealing with the defict from the reduced level of taxation coming into HMRC because of the reduction in the work force due to massive redundances. When the industry has been royally screwed up, then he will address the matter and seek to introduce a new law for Financial Services which in essence will finish the job started by the FSA.

    Someone prove me wrong!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • At least the banker's do somethig for a bonus this lot invent nonsense and charge us for the privilege. MAS £87m for what exactly? Its useless and will fail to help anyone ! FSA costs up 16%, I thought they were closing. What the hell is going on?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps someone with more inside knowledge can clarify a small query on the facts and figures mentioned. The budget is increasing by 15.6%, approximately 10% higher than inflation.
    Hector Sants states "We are mindful of any increase in costs to industry and have continued to maintain headcount and keep core operating costs in line with inflation.”
    So what is going to happen to that 10% extra that apparently isn't needed? I wouldn't be required to hire someone to talk Hector into reluctantly take a promotion to the Bank of England would it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I really shouldn't read these articles, they just get me worked up!

    I don't think any of us mind paying fees / levies / taxes if we feel they will be spent well and help protect consumers in a sensible manner, but I just don't have any confidence the FSA or FCA will achieve this.

    I would suggest that Mr Sants and the FSA budget controller could do with meeting an IFA to discuss prudent spending within a budget and prioritising needs.

    I really do fail to see how the FSA has managed to spend £500m and where it has added value. Increased costs to the industry in many cases lead to added costs for the end consumer.

    The FSA should bear in mind that increasing costs could put financial advice out of the reach of many which doesn't benefit anyone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So the MAS DOES provide advice. Make your minds up chaps!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cutbacks almost everywhere!

    Redundencies left, right and centre!

    Householders throughout the land working out what they can do without!

    And these greedy, arrogant, incompetent people think a 16% increase is acceptable?

    Oh Dear! Oh Dear!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You would get less stick if you paid that money to the bankers as a bonus.

    Next you will be telling us that you were pushed to take the money.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sounds good doesn't it.
    Fees for advisers down from £39.7m to £38.4m.
    However what they fail to mention is that the number of advisers are down substantially & come 2013 will be down further still.
    So the cost per adviser is increasing.
    You would have though that it would cost less to regulate fewer people not more.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


How do you plan to vote at the general election?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments