This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

FCA: Payday loan restrictions could harm consumers

  • Print
  • Comments (19)

FCA logo 480

The Financial Conduct Authority has signalled it may not use new powers to cap interest rates on payday loans as consumers could be left ”worse off”.

In a behavioural economics report, published yesterday, the FCA says restrictions on how many payday loans people can take out could hurt people who need emergency cash.

The Financial Services Act 2012 allows the new regulator to cap interest and restrict the availability of payday loans from April 2014. The current payday loan regulator, the Office of Fair Trading, is launching a crackdown on lenders and banned its first firm last month.

But the FCA says: “Many consumers use payday loans because, despite high APRs, that is the only source of credit available to high-risk borrowers in emergencies.

“They might be made worse off by caps on APR or restrictions on how often they can borrow if they reduce availability to some consumers. Indeed, usury laws and similar provisions have been cited as an example of regulatory failure driven by regulators’ own behavioural biases.”

“Usury” refers to the sale of unethical loans with high interest rates, which has led some cultures and religions, such as Islam, to introduce laws to ban charging interest on loans.

The paper also argues that information disclosures have had “little effect” on borrowers’ understanding of payday loans and have not stopped people allowing them to roll over from one month to the next.

  • Print
  • Comments (19)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (19)

  • How can capping 4978% APR down to 500% or less make people who use these lings worse off? It beggers belief. We got into a HUGE mess because people who could not afford to borrow money borrowed it (at normal rates). What is the effect going to be if more skint people borrow more money at ridiculous rates. The FCA are starting to looking as though they will be as incompetent as their predecessor. Words escape me

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What’s the difference between a loan shark and a payday loan company.

    Answer: Consumer credit licence and FCA turns a blind eye to loan shark rates.

    The people I feel sorry for are the ones in desperate situations who are looking for a regulator to at least do the decent thing by capping interest rates. It’s okay for those people in ivory towers who get paid high salaries and have access to cheap credit.

    Pray they never lose their job and have to rely on payday loan companies!

    The headline should have read “FCA fails millions of poor people by not capping payday loan rates”.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This beggar’s belief. The only way to treat payday loans is to ban them completely. The Regulator is concerned about educating the public in financial matters. Let’s make a start by showing that rule one is to live within your means and know how to budget. Consumers are heavily disadvantaged by the very existence of payday loans.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is it the consumers or the providers they are looking after here? Who are those providers?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Marty: Because otherwise they would not get a legal loan at all, and probably fall on loan sharks, or worse.

    The FCA is entirely right. Caveat debitor. Attempting to ban people who can't or refuse to manage their finances from getting into difficulty is a losing battle. There an infinite number of ways for them to do that other than payday loans.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You lot of rabid frothers, honestly. There are two key reasons for high APRs that have nothing to do with usury. First they include fixed administration charges such as bank transfer charges and credit check fees, which must be included with the often much smaller interest element to calculate APRs. Because loans are so short term the effect of compounding, say a £25 bank CHAPs fee many times over to annualise it, creates your high APRs. And second, interest rates are loaded for bad debts. That's why credit card interest rates sometimes go up, when market interest rates are going down - becuase lenders are being hit with a rise in defaults. Very often you have your fellow man to blame for "being ripped off" because when they default, they are, by definition stealing from you.

    So few people know so little about what they gob off about. Meanwhile, well done FCA.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bryan Jones- Do you not believe that these companies have anything to answer to!?
    I was recently victim of a fraud via a well known pay day lender, where it would appear my details were used to obtain credit.
    If you look at the internet this is rife, and even within my circle of acquaintances I have come across 2 other people this has happened to with the same company!?
    The company inolved is well known for advertising credit within 15 minutes!!! How do you think they do that!? How can you check someones identity, perform credit checks and perform money laundering checks on bank details within that time.
    In my case, and I suspect most, they actually don't and ironically the credit check you list in their many costs, did not actually take place!!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Major supermarket chains back the Conservative party financially and plans to charge a minimum price per unit of alcohol are dropped. Wanger also back the same party financially so why is anybody surprised.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bryan Jones | 11 Apr 2013 11:50 am

    I am sure that there is a big difference between the APR on a credit card and that for a pay day loan.

    Most people on here, being qualified financial advisers, know exactly why interest rates for unsecured loans are higher than secured loans and how to calculate APR.

    The bottom line is that an APR of over 4000% is extortionate.

    You do have to wonder the thinking behind this decision - its like claiming that a minimum price for alcohol would hit responsible drinkers when we all know that responsible drinkers would hardly be affected by it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A few years ago lenders charging 4000% APR (and it doesn't really matter whether that's charges or interest it's still the same cost) were the preserve of sink estates. The collectors wore donkey jackets and carried pick axe handles, and the red top newspapers were full of outrage - quite rightly so!

    It now seems that if the jackets and handles are replaced by a website and a cheap TV commercial during Jeremy Kyle, it's suddenly OK.

    Bryan Jones you don't work for Wonga or such like per chance?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Do you see the value in adviser trade bodies?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments