FCA and PRA will raise FSCS levies

The Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority will both raise levies in future to pay for the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, although only one regulator will collect the levies.

The FSA is currently responsible for raising levies to fund the FSCS, the Consumer Financial Education Body, and the Financial Ombudsman Service.

In a consultation paper on future financial regulation published today, the Treasury says the new FCA, formerly known as the Consumer Protection and Markets Authority, will maintain responsibility for raising levies for the FOS and CFEB.

The FCA, which will look after conduct regulation, and the PRA, which will look after prudential regulation, will both have the power to make rules and raise levies for the FSCS.

The Treasury says: “In relation to the FSCS, both authorities will have the power to make rules, albeit only in relation to the sub-schemes for which they have responsibility, and therefore raise levies.

“It is expected, however, that while the PRA will levy its own fees, a non-statutory arrangement will be put in place for the collection of fees through one organisation, similar to that which currently exists in relation to the collection of the FSCS levy by the FSA.”

When the Treasury put out its first consultation paper on reforming the regulatory system in July, Aifa said the cross subsidisation of providers under the FSCS was crucial to provide protection for consumers.

Last year’s paper suggested that separate compensation schemes could be established to cover conduct regulation and prudential regulation, which would have meant the end of the current cross-subsidy system.

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and

Readers' comments (4)

  • Is this deluge of over regulation and *ollacks ever going to end? someone sink Canary warf before it sinks the UK financial services Industry.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • At least they will be efficient and competent in this area.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Will this mean two lots of costs to collect and sort out the same fees then?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Higher fees, more intrusive regulation, greater powers to these jobsworths and the end result will be more costs to the general public with no tangible improvement to the standards of advice (which I would argue is pretty good for clients who deal with IFAs).

    But the fat cats in Canary Wharf will get fatter ! Actually, FAT CAT and CANARY is a bit of a pun - sorry about that !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Should there be an RDR consumer awareness campaign?

Current Issue