This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+Cover+small+181214
Categories:Advisers,Regulation

Court rejects Arch cru review

  • Print
  • Comment

The High Court has rejected campaigning group Justice in Financial Services’ application for a judicial review of the FSA’s Arch cru compensation package.

The group, led by Joe Egerton, has responded by requesting an oral hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice which is expected to take place at the end of January.
Egerton filed the claim in September on behalf of Coull Money, an IFA which recommended the funds.

The FSA agreed a £54m compensation package in June between Capita Financial Managers, BNY Mellon Trust & Depositary and HSBC Bank.

The deal was estimated to return investors around 70 per cent of the value of the funds as at March 2009 when the range was suspended, when set alongside distributions already made and remaining assets. Latest valuations from Capita put this figure at 66 per cent.

Egerton says: “The refusal of immediate permission on paper is irritating but by no means uncommon. A very large proportion of judicial reviews are given permission to proceed only after an oral hearing, and a high proportion by the appeal court.”

Regulatory Legal is seeking its own judicial review of the compensation package on behalf of 2,700 investors. It expects to hear the outcome of its application this month.

  • Print
  • Comment

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

AXA Wealth


Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Will providers be forced to pay out compensation over annuity misselling?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments