Clarkson Hill reveals FSA probe into systems and controls

Clarkson Hill has revealed it was subject to a regulatory review of its systems and controls during the second half of last year, as it posted pre-tax losses of £636,699 for 2009.

The company says independent consultants have reviewed the group’s processes and revisions have now taken place to bring them in line.

This has resulted in what the company terms as “significant exceptional costs” of £230,787.

The company’s results for the year to December 31, published today, show that Clarkson Hill posted a pre-tax loss on ordinary activities of £636,699 - a marginal improvement on the £669,207 losses posted for the prior 17 months.

The results also reveal Clarkson Hill has been invoiced for £105,000 in relation to the £80m Financial Services Compensation Scheme levy for Pacific Continental Securities (UK), Square Mile Securities and Keydata Investment Services.

The £105,000 has been backdated to 2009 and been reflected in the accounts and identified as an exceptional item, as it is now subject to the judicial review.

A further £129,320 of exceptional costs were incurred as a result of redundancies and the renegotiation of office contracts.

In total, Clarkson Hill were hit with exceptional costs of £465,107.

Following the losses incurred in 2009 and the increased regulatory costs, the group needs to raise further capital to meet regulatory capital requirements.

The directors are currently in discussions with a number of parties and say they are confident that this objective will be achieved.

Clarkson Hill had its shares suspended from trading on AIM yesterday as it was unable to publish its accounts on time. After publishing its accounts today, it has now been able to resume trading.

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and

Readers' comments (3)

  • How can any firm be expected to cope with a request for £105,000 for something over which they had no control?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The company announced that the accounts would be out by the end of May.

    To miss that target by over a month, resulting in the supension of the shares, is careless indeed, especially for a financial planning business!

    Maybe it's time I looked elsewhere. Mind you there seem to be very few IFA firms which have businesses built on anything other than pretty shaky foundations.

    Suggestions on a postcard please!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • the way the IFA world is dissapearing it could be answers on a postage stamp, I have a feeling there will be other firms in this position

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Should there be an RDR consumer awareness campaign?

Current Issue