This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Aifa says FSCS product levy not viable

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Aifa believes a product levy to cover Financial Services Compensation Scheme costs is not politically viable and is wary about the extra short-term costs of moving to other pre-funded models.

The FSA is expected to consult on a review of FSCS funding in the first half of this year. Last week, FSCS chief executive Mark Neale argued reform should focus on reducing unpredictability for firms, potentially through pre-funding or through introducing a risk-based element to the scheme.

Aifa director Robert Sinclair warns pre-funding through building up a big reserve would lead to higher costs for firms who would be paying for current and future claims at the same time.

He says: “Building up a significant fund would mean a succession of years of paying in. That just sucks capital out of firms.

“While we understand the attraction of pre-funding, from a risk and regulatory perspective, it is something we have to think very carefully about.”

Aifa’s preferred funding model would be to calculate firms’ liability based on risk. Last year, Aifa proposed creating a new professional adviser FSCS sub-class so advisers would not be exposed to the failings of stockbrokers or firms such as Keydata.

Sinclair says a product levy, the funding option that is favoured by many advisers, is unlikely to gain political traction.

Last year, Neale warned that a product levy was “a tax on consumers”.

Sinclair says: “Any acceptance in the UK for a product levy would be very much aligned to a financial transaction tax. Therefore, I think that is unlikely to see the light of day.”

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (2)

  • Aifa showing no support for IFAs as usual!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have also decided the FSCS current levy as an IFA is not viable due to the unknown financial risks imposed on my firm should a few major institutions go bust for what ever reason. (I never intended to set my self up as a Lloyds type name responsible for the liabilities for others without any upside)
    For this reason alone I am withdrawing my IFA permissions and referring IFA business.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Do you see the value in adviser trade bodies?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments