Aviva investors urge RSA deal rethink

Some of Aviva’s leading investors have urged the UK insurer to reconsider the £5bn offer from RSA for its UK, Ireland and Canadian general insurance business.

According to the Financial Times, several of the firms biggest investors have urged a rethink on the deal that Aviva considered too weak.

Standard Life investment director Euan Stirling told the FT: “If RSA were to come back with a more serious bid, a slightly raised bid, then Aviva would have to take that more seriously.”

Yesterday, Aviva chairman Lord Sharman said the £5bn offer did not reflect the “synergies” of running life and non-life businesses alongside each other. He said: “Given the compelling strategic and financial benefits to Aviva shareholders of retaining the GI business, its upside potential and the terms offered by RSA, the board was unanimous in rejecting this proposal.”

But RSA retorted with a dismissal of Aviva’s assessment. In a statement to the stock exchange yesterday, it argued that Aviva’s recent weak equity returns and new business strain on the GI side of the firm, coupled with additional impending Solvency II capital demands on non-life business, proved the proposal made sense to both parties.

It said: “The transaction represents in-market consolidation in geographies and lines of business that RSA knows well and in RSA’s view, would give rise to significant cost synergies estimated at £300m per annum pre-tax.”

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and

Readers' comments (3)

  • Seems like Standard Life is looking for short term gain against long term financial sense. Must be in need of cash right now. And of course RSA will say anything to further it's bid. Sharman should ignore them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Do you work at Aviva Steve P? 'Ignoring' RSA is not the right course of action, the two boards should discuss and see if there is anyting to be gained.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Aviva will sell its non-life side but are not so desperate or foolish as to take the first offer. The synergies mentioned by Lord Sharman are real enough and should not be abandoned for a crude cash consideration.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Should there be an RDR consumer awareness campaign?

Current Issue