This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

MPs press for products that fund LTC costs

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

MPs are calling on the Government to create a viable market for financial products that fund long-term care costs in the wake of the Dilnot report.

Dilnot’s recommendations, published last July, call for a cap of between £25,000 and £50,000 on the amount an individual pays for social care costs before the state steps in. It was hoped that this limited individual liability would help create a market for financial products.

In a report into social care, published last week, the health select committee says the Government should accept the proposal but it urges the Government to set out how it will make sure products are available to cover the costs placed on individuals.

The committee says: “The Government should clarify the likely market for pre-funded insurance, equity release and immediate needs annuities as well as pension-related products and other products. It should also articulate how it will work with the industry to stimulate the market for those products.”

Despite claims from care minister Paul Burstow that there is no funding crisis in social care, the report says the Government must face the issue of the funding gap.

Safe Home Income Plans director general Andrea Rozario says: “This is extremely important. How are the Government and financial services industry to come up with solutions to funding care without a full idea of the scale of the problem?”

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (1)

  • It's interesting to see the committee calling for the Government to clarify the likely market for pre-funded LTC insurance, preferably with the incentive of tax relief on the premiums. This surely has to be vastly more cost-effective than Dilnot's estimated £2Bn cost of his present proposals?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


How do you plan to vote at the general election?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments