This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM-Cover-Small-210814.jpg

FSA says it will actively supervise new LTC products

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

Margaret Cole

The FSA says it will be actively supervising the development of new long-term care products in the wake of the Dilnot report on long-term care funding.

The Commission on Funding of Care and Support published its report and recommendations on care funding today.

It calls for a £35,000 cap on individual costs of care, an increase in the means-tested threshold from £23,250 to £100,000, and capping general living costs to between £7,000 and £10,000 a year.

Economist Andrew Dilnot, who chaired the commission said the recommendations should help open up the financial services sector to develop new products for the long-term care market. He said the sector was previously put off the long-term care market as they faced uncapped liability on costs.

In a letter to the Dilnot commission dated July 1, FSA interim managing director for the conduct business unit Margaret Cole (pictured) said the FSA had a close interest in the development of private sector solutions to care funding.

She says: “We will be active in supervising the development of new products, especially in light of previous problems with pre-funded long-term care insurance. Indeed, under our consumer protection strategy, we intend to increase our focus on product design and governance more generally, to try to avoid customer detriment.

“We are also happy to be involved in working groups to consider improvements to the standards of advice for products that meet care fees funding needs. Such products can be complex and consumers may need additional protection.”

In a consultation paper on regulation of long-term care insurance in 2003 the FSA noted the long-term care product range was complex, and risked inappropriate cover depending on the state benefits provided combined with the insurance.

Long-term care insurance products were also found to be expensive and generally only bought by wealthy individuals.

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (3)

  • Ms Cole says "previous problems with pre-funded long-term care insurance."
    Evidence please.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wot ~ like you did with the Arch Cru products?

    And is there any history of consumer detriment in the LTC field? Or is this just a case of the FSA wanting to let everyone know that this time round it intends to stick its nose into something at a really early stage?

    I still think that both the industry and the FSA should be lobbying government to grant tax relief on monthly premiums to insured LTC products. Surely that'd be much simpler and cost the exchequer less that what this bloke Andrew Dildo's proposing? The best way to encourage people to take action for themselves (or for their children to do so on their behalf) is tax assistance with simple insured products ~ isn't it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The more I read the Dilnot report the more I become confused. Raising the capital limit to £100,000 and retaining the tariff income means a "local authority" care home resident will be charged £343 week + pension(s) (less personal allowance). Effectively the LA will have to contribute littel if nothing towards the care costs at this level of capital limit. Did AD ask a work experiance school boy to work this one out or is this a clever ploy to reduce the cost to government!!! These recommendations will do nothing to raise the quality of care provided by the state, are more confusing than the current system and I doubt will encourage anyone to prepare for their later life.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Should the FCA relax pension transfer qualification requirements?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments