Pension regulator to keep 'close eye' on employer advice post-RDR

The Pensions Regulator says it will be watching closely to see whether the impact of retail distribution review makes it less attractive for employers navigating auto-enrolment to use IFAs.
In a work and pension select committee hearing this morning, Conservative MP and committee member Oliver Heald said there was a risk that “very transparently” having to pay for advice as a result of the abolition of commission could put employers off.
The Pensions Regulator chief executive Bill Galvin said of the 56 per cent of employers who will seek advice only around one third say they are willing to pay for it. He added that advisers would have to demonstrate the value of their service to those firms.
He said: “This is something that needs to be worked through between advisers and employers and it is something we will be keeping a close eye on.”
Auto-enrolment of employees into workplace pensions gets under way this October with the RDR coming into force on January 1 2013.
The Government has said it is willing to consider capping pension charges if the industry cannot come up with a plan to keep them low enough. However, Galvin warned against a cap calling it a “blunt tool” which would make it harder for new entrants to come to market.
He said: “A world with very strict regulation confining charging structures might limit opportunities for people to bring propositions to market which are more suitable for different types of customer. We need to accommodate propositions that appeal to well paid and well informed workforces as well as the median employee.”
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing
Most popular
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
Aegon moves ARC platform admin in-house from Novia
-
BoI reverses mortgage rate hike for 1,200 borrowers
-
Just Retirement to launch long-term care annuity as sales slump
-
Platforms rule out copying Standard Life's rebate tax move
Most commented
-
Neil Liversidge: Would anyone use 'hard fees' if they didn't have to?
-
Nic Cicutti: Advisers and fund managers need to tackle their charges
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
FCA under pressure to re-think Sipp cap-ad plans
-
Threesixty launches DFM due diligence service






Readers' comments (2)
Chippy Minton | 11 Jan 2012 3:13 pm
The law of unintended consequences strikes RDR yet again demonstrating YET AGAIN that the FSA never thought this through properly.
Previously employers paying, say 3%, into a pension got the advice services as part of the package. Now they are being asked to pay for it in addition.
The advice will be expensive as employee meetings and individual consultations may be needed.
So what will happen? Employers simply won't bother.
So between them the Government and the FSA has killed workplace pensions other than their crappy NEST scheme.
Increase pensions take up by removing all the profit from distribution and dis-incentivise employers. Nice - well done - have a bonus.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 11 Jan 2012 3:22 pm
They can always use MAS, after all they are FREE!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment