This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+cover+small+180914
Categories:Politics,Regulation

Aviva says FCA duty of care proposal is "unnecessary"

  • Print
  • Comment

Aviva says a proposal for the Financial Conduct Authority to ensure financial firms provide an “appropriate” level of care to consumers is unnecessary because rules are already in place which ensure they do.

The financial services bill says the FCA’s consumer protection objective should require firms “to provide consumers with a level of care that is appropriate” taking into account their risk appetite, the product risk and the consumers financial capabilities.

In a document submitted to the public bill committee, which is currently looking at the bill, Aviva says Treating Customers Fairly principles and new powers the FCA will have make the objective “unnecessary”.

It says: “Firms are required to follow FSA rules and guidance, high level principles on Treating Customers Fairly and will be subject to a more intensive product intervention regime. It therefore seems unnecessary for firms to also be expected to provide consumers with a level of care that is appropriate. This principle needs to be scrutinised and clarified.”

The note says the regulator should focus more on delivering positive consumer outcomes rather than avoiding negative ones. It says the regulator’s consumer protection objective should instead include a regard to “the potential benefits of consumers accessing suitable financial products that meet their needs.”

The call could find support from Labour members of the public bill committee currently considering amendments to the bill. Last week, Labour proposed amending the FCA’s competition objective so it considers “the ease with which consumers can identify and obtain services which are appropriate to their needs and represent good value for money”.

The firm also calls for:

  • The removal of proposals to stop the Upper Tribunal being able to substitute its opinion for that of the regulator.
  • Accountability at the Bank of England to be beefed up before it is given wide ranging new powers.
  • The FCA and the Prudential Regulation Authority to be required to identify where they can share services and information to minimise burdens on firms.
  • The PRA to have to carry out more in depth consultations on new rules and for how it should consult to be set down in law rather than left to the regulator.
  • For the FCA to clearly set out the circumstances under which it will use its power to ban products for a year.

The public bill committee is scrutinising amendments to the bill made by the 20 committee members. It will finish its work on March 22 when other MPs will be able to propose amendments.

  • Print
  • Comment

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Is Labour right to be concerned about the unintended consequences of the Budget pension reforms?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments