This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+cover+small+180914
Categories:Pensions,Politics

Thinktank: Abolish higher rate tax-relief on pension lump sums

  • Print
  • Comments (5)

Higher rate tax relief on pension lump sums should be abolished to increase tax revenue and make pension tax relief more progressive, according to the Centre Forum thinktank.

Under current rules individuals over the age of 55 qualify for a tax-free lump sum up to the value of £450,000. This is set to be cut to £375,000 next year.

The paper, A relief for some: how to stop lump sum tax favouring the wealthy, was published today and says those taking a lump sum above the 40 per cent income tax threshold should pay tax at the appropriate income tax rate.

It says: “Making this change would prevent those with the greatest means from gaining disproportionately via a taxpayer subsidy of their pension income. Also, we estimate the change would contribute an extra 5 per cent to annual income tax revenues from future pensions in payment.”

The report says the tax free lump sum was introduced to encourage pension savings but that the current system is expensive for the taxpayer and disproportionately benefits the wealthy.

  • Print
  • Comments (5)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (5)

  • Public Sector pensions liability now exceeds £ 1 TRILLION and all this think tank can come up with is "lets knock private pensions again"

    Then again private pension plan holders don't threaten to bring the country to a standstill everytime the Govt changes private pension rules and benefits or taxes their funds to the tune of £5 BILLION a year!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think even a revenue-starved Treasury might baulk at any retrospective elimination of TFC. By the time you've refined this proposal to avoid retrospection, and prevented avoidance through phased drawdown, etc etc, the whole thing just becomes too complex.

    Being mischievous, I would point out that the Treasury has just enacted an incredibly regressive change by allowing those rich to enough to use flexible drawdown to effectively avoid the 55% tax rate on lump sums on death in drawdown: perhaps they could do something about that instead ?!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The removal of the tax free lump sum on any level above the 40% tax rate would be mad.

    It would be easy for an individual to have never been a higher rate tax payer throughout their life and to then find they have to pay higher rate tax on the pension lump sum.

    Take a pension pot of £200k not that large and not the size of fund which would keep a rich person in the lifestyle they were used to. this would give a lump sum payment of £50,000 i.e. above higher rate tax rate.

    based on a 65 yr old male with a 63 yr old spouse a level annuity would be in the region of £8,300 at bset assuming standard terms.

    Why should he have to pay tax on the pension he may have spent 40+ years contributing to.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another day, another bonkers pension tax relief "proposal". Sigh.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • the center forum think tank should get real and live in the real world! The example given on page 4 of their report gives a person A at 25 years old on a salary of £300,000 a year and paying £50,000 a year into his pension fund!The only people who are likely to be on this sort of money ar either working in the financial industry or a footballer.They are certainly not one or the many millions of hard working people who have worked all of their lives and contributed to providing for themselves when they retire and have never been a finantial drain on the state and are neither likely to be.
    So get real Mr Mark Lloyd and Mr Chris Nicholson (REPORT AUTHORS) and consider real people! LEAVE THE TAX FREE LUMP SUM ALONE!!!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Do you think the industry is ready to deliver Budget guidance?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments