This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Rule shake-up to cost 10 times FSA estimate

  • Print
  • Comments (4)

The FSA’s proposed changes to disclosure rules for pensions and adviser-charging will cost the industry £200m rather than the £20m estimated by the regulator, according to Finance & Technology Research Centre director Ian McKenna.

McKenna says the FSA’s estimate demonstrates a “woeful lack of understanding” of the costs of system implementation.

Earlier this month, a consultation from the regulator proposed changes to product disclosure arising from RDR adviser and consultancy charging and new Sipp disclosure rules.

McKenna says introducing systems for the reforms would cost the industry £200m. He says: “The FSA has either not done its homework properly or it has missed a zero off the end of the numbers. The amount of work needed to change systems is significant, especially the requirement to show the impact of adviser charges on the reduction in yield.

“The £20m figure suggests a woeful lack of understanding of the cost of system implementation and changes. This is going to make it very, very difficult for a lot of small Sipp providers.”

Standard Life head of pensions policy John Lawson said earlier this month the proposals, if implemented, would put half of Sipp administrators out of business. He said: “We are talking about costs in the millions of pounds to build a system which can do this. Any Sipp administrator that is not an insurer will be thinking this is going to be horrendous.”

An FSA spokesman says: “As with any consultation, the FSA is inviting individuals and firms to contact us and give us their feedback.”

  • Print
  • Comments (4)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (4)

  • An industry disappearing up its own backside led by the regulator. Another reason for the Labour government to hang its head in shame.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just yet another hopeless underestimation of cost. When was the last time they got anything right? I notice Skandia have just increased their annual fee by 31%, not for any greater benefit to the customer but to pay for increased pension legislation and other regulatory burden. When will these 'jokers' on their unaccountable PAYE DB gravy train get anything right? I suspect that they are too arrogant to even care.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No surprise then about missing a 0 off!

    Is this a true consultation, or simply window dressing as the FSA mind (if it has one) is already made up?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So where's the FSA's Cost:Benefits Analysis? Not that it'd make any difference ~ the FSA has decided that this is what the industry is goig to have to do and to hell with what it'll cost. After all, the costs are always borne by everybody else.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


How do you plan to vote at the general election?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments