This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
Money Marketing Cover
Categories:Other,Pensions

Paul Farrow: ABI should not dismiss damning NAPF report

  • Print
  • Comments (5)

The date of the RDR draws ever closer, yet you get the impression that the regulator still has not thought it through.

It was only a fortnight ago that the new chief of the FCA Michael Wheatley put his head above the parapet to warn that there were examples of bad practice among bank advisers. They were selling five-year investment bonds to people “not expected to live past the next World Cup”, he said.

The quote would be amusing if it was not so serious.

The RDR looks more likely to push the general public to their local high-street bank for financial advice than it is to IFAs. And then comes along a damning report from the NAPF and Cass Business School into the annuity market which provides further evidence that the RDR may do more harm than good.

The report is punchy to say the least, accusing the annuity industry of using “murky pricing and “sharp practices”.

The authors’ main concerns are that workers with smaller pension pots will suffer the most. Some 80 per cent of retiring workers with DC plans have pots that are less than £50,000 in size and with autoenrolment around the corner hundreds of thousands, will be in the same boat.

Not that the Association of British Insurers reckons that there is a problem. True to form, it gives the distinct impression that the NAPF has over-egged the whole story and insists that 70 per cent of people do shop around. It is “consulting” on getting the remaining 30 per cent to do the same.

The NAPF does not buy the ABI’s response and nor do I.

There has been evidence that suggests that many pension providers do the bare minimum when it comes to explaining that customers can go elsewhere for an annuity. In many circumstances, the wording used in the literature suggests that people would lose out if they did apply to another annuity provider.

Providers have also long been accused of duping pension savers out of a third of their retirement income because they are using complex jargon and legalese to put them off shopping around for the best annuity.

Crucially, the NAPF reckons that the ABI is getting confused between the DC market (which is growing) and the personal pension market (which is flat).

“While ABI research indicates that more DC customers are shopping around, we understand that the figures are more indicative of activity in the individual personal pension market, where individuals ’buy’ a pension product, usually through an adviser, rather than in workplace DC, where employees join the company pension scheme,” the report said.

With Nest and autoenrolment, more and more people will be passive in their annuity choice and simply accept what is handed to them.
As each year goes by, Britons are subconsciously being told it is your future, it is your retirement and so it is your problem. The problem is that most people do not realise it yet. It means that increasing numbers of people in the years ahead are going to need expert advice more than ever, not sales patter from a junior bank clerk.

Final-salary schemes are a spent force and definedcontribution schemes are still at the trial stage.

As the NAPF and Cass have pointed out, the end game is as important as building the pension pot in the first place.

The ABI’s response is worryingly dismissive. Few people truly believe that consumers are making the best choice when they come to retire and the trade body should be above taking the report so personally.

The ABI appears to be turning a blind eye to another RDR banana skin and it could have serious repercussions for millions of workers.

Paul Farrow is personal finance editor at the Telegraph Media GroupMoney Marketing

  • Print
  • Comments (5)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (5)

  • You can take an horse to water but you cant make it drink.

    Apathy and lack of knowledge means that many people no matter how much you tell them of their options will opt for the route of least resistence i.e. stay with the existing provider.

    What we need is legislation that makes the OMO the default option unless guaranteed benefits apply.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We have been saying the RDR has been bringing big problems for years. Why is it only now the penny has finally dropped with NAPF? Still better late than never. We need to get this monstrosity dropped or at worst, delayed until ALL of the unintended consequences have been ironed out properly. This will not happen if RDR goes ahead and in years to come The head of the FCA will blame the previous head of teh FSA for acting the way he did and in the meantime hundreds of thousands of the very people this THING called RDR was supposed to protect will cause untold detriment to them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @ Anon 9.55.
    Spot on. When the proverbial hits the fan, the FCA will blame the FSA. Then they will probably morph into FBA or suchlike and blame the FCA and on and on and on the unelected unaccountable quango trots.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All the posters on here are perfectly correct, but we live in unelected quango land. It doesn't matter if we elect a different Govt, it just continues as normal. There are workable solutions to the annuity lottery problem and to many other major issues, but there is no political will to deal with these matters. Truth is, the system as it is suits the many people working in it, so don't expect anything more than hot air anytime soon. Major long terms detriment to ordinary people just doesn't represent a problem for our ruling elite. They couldn't care less.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "The RDR looks more likely to push the general public to their local high-street bank for financial advice than it is to IFAs"

    We hear this comment quite often but no evidence as to why.

    I wonder if Paul might describe his reasoning?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Do you agree with calls for a flat 30% rate of pensions tax relief?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments