This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

James Hay plea for Sipp property rules to be eased

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

The James Hay Partnership has written to Prime Minister David Cameron urging the Government to reinstate more flexible rules governing Sipp investments in commercial property.

In the 2004 Budget, Chancellor Gordon Brown changed the borrowing limit for pension schemes investing in commercial property from 75 per cent of the property value to 50 per cent of the pension fund value.

This reduced the gearing ratio on property investments from 75 per cent to 33 per cent.

James Hay business development director Richard Mattison says that, under the old rules, a person with £25,000 could borrow £75,000 to buy a property, but under the current rules the same person could borrow just £12,500.

Mattison says: “Reinstating the old rules on commercial property investments would encourage people to save for their retirement, boost the commercial property market and encourage bank lending. The Government has a chance to do something positive here.”

Informed Choice managing director Martin Bamford says: “I would support this change and I think it fits in with the Government’s agenda for growth. Anything that will encourage increased transactions in commercial property has got to be a good thing.”

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (2)

  • This is a common goal for all SIPP/SSAS Providers but the rest of us lend our support to AMPS, our industry body who make representations on behalf of all members rather than seeking publicity for rehashed old news.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • James Hay are one of the worst for their rules and incompetence. Sounds like they are lobbying for everything I have been complaining about. Just hope for the rule changes so I can get as far away from them as possible. They could start by changing their own rules and allow sipp owners to run their own properties.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Do you see the value in adviser trade bodies?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments