This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+301014+small
Categories:Pensions

James Hay plea for Sipp property rules to be eased

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

The James Hay Partnership has written to Prime Minister David Cameron urging the Government to reinstate more flexible rules governing Sipp investments in commercial property.

In the 2004 Budget, Chancellor Gordon Brown changed the borrowing limit for pension schemes investing in commercial property from 75 per cent of the property value to 50 per cent of the pension fund value.

This reduced the gearing ratio on property investments from 75 per cent to 33 per cent.

James Hay business development director Richard Mattison says that, under the old rules, a person with £25,000 could borrow £75,000 to buy a property, but under the current rules the same person could borrow just £12,500.

Mattison says: “Reinstating the old rules on commercial property investments would encourage people to save for their retirement, boost the commercial property market and encourage bank lending. The Government has a chance to do something positive here.”

Informed Choice managing director Martin Bamford says: “I would support this change and I think it fits in with the Government’s agenda for growth. Anything that will encourage increased transactions in commercial property has got to be a good thing.”

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (2)

  • This is a common goal for all SIPP/SSAS Providers but the rest of us lend our support to AMPS, our industry body who make representations on behalf of all members rather than seeking publicity for rehashed old news.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • James Hay are one of the worst for their rules and incompetence. Sounds like they are lobbying for everything I have been complaining about. Just hope for the rule changes so I can get as far away from them as possible. They could start by changing their own rules and allow sipp owners to run their own properties.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Should Sesame unwind the 'pay to play' deals it set up as part of its restricted advice panel?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments