HMRC U-turn on drawdown transfer trap

The Government has made a U-turn on rules to tax income drawdown investors aged between 50 and 55 with an unauthorised payment charge on any income taken if they switch to another provider.
In a note, published late last Friday, HM Revenue & Customs says it intends to bring forward regulations to remove the unauthorised payment charge admitting that it was an unintentional consequence.
It adds that it plans to backdate the regulations to cover transfers made on or after April 6, 2010.
The pensions industry, led by the Association of Member-Directed Pension Schemes, has been lobbying HMRC on its interpretation of the rules regarding the increase of the minimum retirement age from 50 to 55.
HMRC’s original stance was to tax any income taken through a new drawdown provider if an investor switched or any income provided if an individual used their drawdown fund to buy an annuity.
Last month, HMRC updated its interpretation of the rules so that investors who switched providers before their 55th birthday would incur a 55 per cent unrecognised transfer charge on their entire fund, rather than just on income payments, outraging stakeholders.
But days later, following further legal advice, HMRC decided that this would not be case although it insisted that income payments through a new provider would still be seen as an unauthorised payment.
Friday’s note states: “The Government intends to bring forward regulations to remove the unauthorised payments tax charge where an individual aged 50 and over but under 55 transfers their pension in payment to another pension provider.
“The regulations will apply where sums and assets of an income drawdown fund are transferred to a new income drawdown fund with another provider or sums and assets underpinning an existing lifetime annuity are transferred to another provider to provide a new lifetime annuity.
“The regulations will ensure that there will be no unauthorised payment tax charge on these sums and assets and any payments of pension after the transfer.”
The changes will also include transfers from existing short term annuities as well as scheme pension.
The industry is hailing the move as a “victory for common sense” albeit belated.
Standard Life head of pensions policy John Lawson says: “To stop pensioners drawing income just because they transferred their pension was just plain wrong. It is good to see that HMRC has taken action to remove this legal glitch.”
LV= head of pensions Ray Chinn says: “We have been in discussions with HMRC and it was clear that the restriction was an unintended consequence of the legislation.
“The swift action that has been promised, together with the agreement the legislation will be backdated is a victory for common sense and will ensure that customers are treated fairly instead of being trapped by a quirk of legislation.”
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing





Readers' comments (5)
You must be joking | 5 Jul 2010 10:54 am
COMMON SENSE PREVAILS AT LAST...
I would suggest that the FSA spokesperson who suggested that IFAs should prepare for complaints should now issue a formal apology.
HMRC's stance showed a poor understanding of the legislation.
FSA's stance showed a poor understanding of the legislation.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
paolo standerwick | 5 Jul 2010 10:56 am
Bit of common sense coming out of HMRC, what next?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Bob Perry | 5 Jul 2010 11:17 am
This is good news, but HMRC now needs to address the anomlay of the recent Budget announcement re transitional arrangements for those individuals attaining age 75 on or after 22nd June 2010. i.e defferal of annuity purchase to age 77 whilst new legislation is brought in. The transitional arrangements do not apply to existing ASP policyholders. This is discriminatory and makes no sense. If the transitional arrangments could apply to all ASP policyholders it will potentially increase the amount of tax received by HMRC. It will not cost HMRC a bean. They would not be giving anything away. The only potential losers are charities.
The whole situation is a result of flawed, punitive, vindictive legislation brought in by Gordon Brown.
The coalition/Gerge Osborne had/has a chance to do something very simple that will be a winner for HMRC/the Governement/ ASP policyholders/ children, nephews,neices etc of ASP policyholders.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Keith Davidson | 5 Jul 2010 11:25 am
Why do they need to "bring forward regulations" when they simply misunderstood their own regulations in the first place. All they need to do is issue a statement of clarification which we now have.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 5 Jul 2010 3:13 pm
Well at last some sense from HMRC although on reading the document on the HMRC website it seems they have only half solved the issues. An individual in USP can now transfer to another provider and take income through USP with no income issues, however an individual in USP can still not purchase an annuity without incurring unauthorised payment charges.
Nearly there HMRC now to go the final step and let people take their income as they see fit not still stuck in their current form!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment