This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Govt proposes radical pensions disclosure simplification

  • Print
  • Comments (21)

London UK Parliament 480

The Government has proposed a series of simplifications to pensions disclosure rules as policymakers consider moving towards a more “principles-based” approach.

The Department for Work and Pensions has published a consultation detailing plans to remove duplications in disclosure requirements affecting occupational, personal and stakeholder schemes and harmonise the different sets of rules where possible.

In particular, officials have moved to iron out any repetition and “discrepancies” between FSA and DWP rules.

Proposed changes include:

  • removing regulations requiring personal pension schemes to provide basic scheme information where these duplicate FSA conduct of business rules;

  • simplifying the terminology used in DWP regulations;

  • requiring personal pension schemes and defined-contribution schemes to inform members that their funds are being invested on a “lifestyling” basis;

  • removing the requirement for schemes to assume a member will take an annually increasing annuity when producing illustrations. The DWP says this will allow schemes to provide projections which relate to the choices a member actually makes at the point of retirement;

  • updating disclosure requirements to clarify how websites and email can be used to disclose information to members.

The Government wants to introduce these simplified disclosure standards in October this year.

In addition, the Government is considering moving to a more “principles-based” approach to pensions disclosure. Any such change would be consulted on separately.

If this happened, strict rules around how pension schemes provide information to members could be scrapped and replaced with a single high level principle.

The DWP suggests this principle could be that “members should be given sufficient information that allows them to understand the benefits to which they will be entitled and any other relevant information that will enable each member to make decisions in his or her best interests”.

  • Print
  • Comments (21)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (21)

  • As soon as I see the words "pensions" and "simplification" in the same sentence I am filled with dread!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh dear all this simplification tends to be complicated. Remember the decision tree which rapidly grew into a decision forest?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Here we go. It's Thursday and time for another piece of pension tinkering. Do you wonder people don't save into pensions?

    What will it be next week? The annual allowance will be your average salary over the last 20 years, multiplied by your age, divided by the square root of bugger all to compute half the tax relief at basic rate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @ Simon
    Yes! and then we could not see the wood for the trees.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Harry Katz, its time to retire when you're being praised by that scourge of IFA's, financial journalist Tony Hazell (in last weeks FA).

    Quit while you're ahead!

    Surely, life can be more enjoyable if you can disconnect yourself from the madness that is the FSA/FCA.

    I'm getting on a bit myself and I could not imagine a worse future than sitting there trying to complete the RMAR.

    Most of the older IFA's that I know have managed to decouple themselves from the FSA, one way or another.

    Surely you don't need the grief anymore?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I like simplification, it creates work and generates fees.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh but surely complexities like this don't make people look at pensions and say 'sod that I don't get it so I won't bother'!!??? lol. Course they do!

    I gotta say why not get it right in the first place?? Why not plan ahead DWP & FSC/FCA rather than just running head first in to things!??

    Which also begs the question why make auto-enrolment so complex too. Many employers will end up in hot water because they don't understand it, and yes that's good for us as we can guide them through and charge fees for our help, but really how many employers are going to adhere to the rules and not 'nudge' staff to 'opt out'. It should be simple - everyone pays X% total min X% employer, everyone certfies the scheme for X months at a time, all pay above X and below X goes in whatever type of pay it is. Anyone can put in extra within the normal pension limits, You can only opt out if you have another pension scheme that you are paying in at least X% to (or will breach your LT allowance by paying in). You have up to 3 months to join the scheme with a new employer or you are in Nest. The only other exeption where you cannot pay in is if you are terminally ill. End of. Not 4 options of paying in levels, different income types treated differently, different reporting schedules, etc. Keep things imple they work, don't and they won't.

    It should also be advertised PROPERLY most people think these ads on telly are just encouraging people to pay into pensions and do not realise it will effect them in the next few years - even employers!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • For SME's, this is just another administrative nightmare.

    Honestly, you can easily see why some 60% of small businesses resolutely remain one-man/woman bands.

    They know it would be suicidal to employ anybody in the conventional sense.

    And that is without the coming 'event' of HMRC's RT PAYE system, which I predict, will cause utter chaos.

    The Government is ultimately responsible for this and they simply do not have a clue.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Heard this one before folks?

    The last simplification contained more legislation than the three previous regimes it was replacing!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • To be completely fair, the 'enemy within' is not really the Westminster politicians.

    They are only nominally in control and are just the visible surface, which takes all the flak.

    Underneath lurks the real beast, the Whitehall machine, which jealously guards its own, including the associated QUANGO's such as the FSA/FCA.

    Until somebody is brave enough to take on and utterly defeat this beast, we English will continue to go down the proverbial plughole.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


How do you plan to vote at the general election?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments