This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Govt has made 'no savings' from public sector retirement age hike

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

The Government has made no savings by increasing the retirement age for public sector workers to 67, independent pensions consultant John Ralfe says.

Ralfe’s analysis suggests the savings to the tax payer from aligning the retirement ages of public sector workers with the state pension age will be offset by improved accrual rates and above-inflation annual increases in pension payments.

Ralfe says: “Danny Alexander told the House of Commons in December the things that had been agreed in negotiations with trade unions, including the new proposal for accrual rates and the increase in the pension age, would save the Government tens of billions of pounds.

“But the total cost of the new pension arrangements compared with the existing arrangements are pretty much identical.”

In its response, the Treasury says Ralfe’s analysis is “partial” and does not include savings from planned increases in employee contributions and switching the measure for pension rises from RPI to CPI.

Trade unions and the Government are close to reaching an agreement over the reforms after Treasury Chief Secretary Danny Alexander (pictured) announced further concessions in December.

The latest proposals offer more favourable rates for accruing pension benefits, better protection for workers approaching retirement and no watering down of the Government’s “fair deal” policy which protects the pension rights of employees whose roles are transferred to the private sector.

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (2)

  • The usual standard of work then? Lots of change, more red tape - no benefit to the taxpayer! Sounds like all of the previous pension changes and 'simplifications'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • More money would be saved if the government had instead acted to put an end to all these phoney redundancy with a lavishly enhanced early retirement pension deals, often with the lucky recipient then being invited back on a "consultancy" basis just a few months later. Why no action on that front?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Do you see the value in adviser trade bodies?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments