FSA clamps down on Sipp disclosure rules

The Financial Services Authority has proposed amendments to Sipp disclosure rules in a bid to reduce mis-buying and mis-selling.
The FSA says the changes, in anticipation of the new RDR adviser charging rules, will “encourage a more transparent personal pension scheme market” and “facilitate customers or their advisers making better purchasing decisions”.
A consultation, published today, proposes amending the disclosure rules relevant to key features illustrations for personal pension schemes.
It also seeks to introduce a rule requiring personal pension scheme operators to disclose whether or not they receive commissions and/or retain bank account interest on money held within the scheme. The FSA says this information should be disclosed alongside information about fees, costs and charges payable, and bank interest rates receivable, by the client.
Finally, the regulator is considering amending the disclosure rules that apply to the effect of charges and the reduction in yield information, so that disclosure is required for personal pension schemes.
Moretosipps founder and former Suffolk Life director of marketing John Moret says the rules could lead to “further confusion” and higher costs. He says: “Most of the issues around perceived Sipp mis-selling or mis-buying have arisen not through the lack of clarity around Sipp charges but as a result of a lack of proper regulatory controls on the advice process, coupled in some cases with provider inducements aimed at encouraging transfers.”
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing
Most popular
Most commented
-
Neil Liversidge: Would anyone use 'hard fees' if they didn't have to?
-
Nic Cicutti: Advisers and fund managers need to tackle their charges
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
FCA under pressure to re-think Sipp cap-ad plans
-
Threesixty launches DFM due diligence service
Most emailed
-
Just Retirement to launch long-term care annuity as sales slump
-
BoI reverses mortgage rate hike for 1,200 borrowers
-
Barclays to cut Help to Buy deal by 0.5% and launch lowest-ever 5-year fix
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
Threesixty launches DFM due diligence service






Readers' comments (1)
Ben Greyling | 8 Feb 2011 0:20 am
Reading through the consultation it appears the main purpose is to force SIPP administrators to disclose their hidden or not so obvious charges.
This primarily effects those administrators who receive "backhanders" from mutual funds/banks, or those who are in cahoots with financial advisers.
As far as I'm concerned, this is a good thing.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment