View more on these topics

Pension reciprocation schemes launch appeal

The trustees of six pension schemes used for pension reciprocation have launched an appeal against the High Court’s ruling that the arrangements are illegal.

In June last year, Money Marketing revealed The Pensions Regulator had appointed independent trustee firm Dalriada Trustees to seize control of the bank accounts of the six schemes due to concerns the loans could be legally void.

In July, a High Court judge froze over £1m of fees charged to members of reciprocation plans administered by Ark Business Consulting and two related entities.

In December, the court ruled that maximising pension value arrangements, which the schemes use to allow investors to access up to 50 per cent of the value of their pension pot before age 55, are legally void.

An appeal has now been lodged by trustee firms Athena and Minerva. A decision on whether the appeal will be heard is expected in March.

A Dalriada spokesman says: “We are not yet clear on what grounds the appeal is being made. The notice basically appeals against every argument that has been upheld in the original judgment.”

Dalriada was unable to guarantee that legal action would not lead to a further depletion of members’ funds.

Recommended

3

L&G wants absolute return sector axed

Legal & General Investments managing director Simon Ellis (pictured) has called for the absolute return sector to be abolished and for funds to be distributed into other IMA sectors. The Investment Management Association is currently reviewing the absolute return sector classification. The review is expected to conclude by the third quarter of this year. Ellis […]

SJP to launch multi-asset and global equity income funds

St James’s Place is launching a multi-asset fund and a global equity income fund next month as it looks to broaden its investment offering. The multi-asset fund will be run by Pimco, while the global equity income fund will be run by Invesco. Both funds are set to be launched on February 1. As part […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Christopher Lean 19th January 2012 at 7:11 pm

    So, an appeal will challenge this and the implication is that the defence of this will have to be funded from the policyholders’ funds.

    In the event that this fails, then the policyholders will be in even more dire straights than they are now.

Leave a comment