Where big is best

Hannah Stodell
Cofunds' new charging structure for fund groups has raised concerns amongst some parties that the platform may see its investment universe shrink in size.

Last week Money Marketing revealed that the investment platform is to increase its charges for fund groups from January with smaller funds set to be hit hardest.

All groups will pay more on the platform but the new structure will also take into account asset size and sales.

Funds will be put into one of four pricing tiers depending on the volume of sales with higher sales attracting lower additional percentage fees.

The highest add-on to the annual fee is five basis points but Cofunds refuses to reveal the lowest tier charge and denies there will be a zero level for the biggest and most popular sellers.

Cofunds says this is the first fee hike since it was established in 2001 and the pricing structure will not change for three years.

T Bailey fund manager Jason Britton says: “If platform pricing were to move to a basis that adversely affected boutique fund groups that could cause a problem for advisers.”

Whitechurch Securities managing director Gavin Haynes says: “If it reduces the number of fund groups that feel it is commercially viable to list on Cofunds and therefore reduces the number of funds advisers can select then it could have a detrimental effect and will certainly be concerning for IFAs who put a large proportion of business on the platform.”

Clarity associate director Glyn Bolton says: “The choice on Cofunds is very broad and if it ends up restricting the choice that would be bad news but I can’t imagine they will be cutting their own throat and will have worked it out very carefully so that people will stay on board.”

Do you agree with the new charging structure?

Let me know your thoughts by clicking on the link below.

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and

Readers' comments (3)

  • CoFunds
    anything that reduces the number of funds woudl conern me as would givingin preerential treatment to the 'big' funds

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cofunds' new charging structure for fund groups
    if it inhibits some fund providers from going on the platform, then the choice that cofunds will offer to IFA is reduced - when the tipping point is passed where the reduced choice to IFA's effects what they can offer/ provide thier clients, then the IFA will shop elswhere.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • RDR and mirror funds
    Am I right in thinking this is a response to RDR as the potential for the fund and insurance providers to quietly rip large amounts out of client's investment funds is restricted?? Now we start to see the genuine pricing of 'low cost' high commission structures-try unravelling the pricing of Cofunds/L&G's structures.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Do we need a new industry standard on fund charges?

Current Issue

Money Marketing Academy