This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM-Cover-Top-240714.jpg
Categories:Pensions

Pru chairman faces AGM revolt

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Prudential chairman Hugh McGrath faces shareholder protest against his re-election at the firm’s AGM on Thursday, led by Fidelity, according to the Financial Times.

Up to 20 per cent of the largest investors are expected to vent their anger at the role played  by McGrath when Prudential was forced to scrap its £21.9bn takeover of rival AIA just over a year ago. Investors refused to back the original bid price and AIA’s parent company, AIG, refused to lower the terms. It cost Prudential £377m in fees.

However, a large shareholder, who was opposed to the AIA takeover, told the Financial Times it would support the management in the vote.

‘A lot has moved on from when we’d have objected [to McGrath’s appointment],’ they told the newspaper.

‘The time to strike was then, but many institutions were lily-livered. It’s pathetic to wait until now to vote against the management.’

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (2)

  • It is a great pity that these large shareholders were not so vocal when Prudential plundered the inherited estates to the tune of 1.6 billion pounds at the policyholders expense.This was to pay for mis-selling costs,to subsidise new business and to pay shareholders tax bills.The £377 million in fees looks like peanuts to the £1.6 billion. Learn to live with it the policyholders had no say why should you?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lesley, do you realise how little sense your post made?

    You appear to be complaining that shareholders did not vote out the board for running the business in a way that made them more profit.

    It seems any article with "Prudential" in the title is bringing you out in a rash in your desperation to repeat what was old news years ago.

    If you don't like the way they did their business, I suggest you drop the FSA a note - they seem interested in the Pru's business recently.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

The Cost of Advice

Sponsored by Brooks Macdonald

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Do you think advisers will benefit from Chancellor George Osborne's guidance guarantee?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments