This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Thinktank urges Ukip to tackle financial regulation

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Thinktank the Institute of Economic Affairs has urged Ukip to stem the tide of FCA regulation in a speech to the party’s annual conference.

Speaking in London today, IEA director-general Mark Littlewood said Ukip must broaden its appeal beyond its policy to leave the European Union and outline plans on public spending and regulation.

He said the scale and scope of financial services regulation is too much and called on the party to take a stand against the FCA’s growing powers.

Ukip opposes the RDR and says it would scrap FCA rules which ban commission payments.

Littlewood said: “The FCA handbook is divided into 10 sections. The section entitled prudential standards is divided into 11 sub-sections, the sub-section entitled prudential sourcebook for banks, building societies and investment firms is made up of 14 sub-sub-sections, the sub-sub-section called market risk is divided into 11 sub-sub-sub-sections and the sub-sub-sub section on interest rates is 66 paragraphs.

“There are over a million paragraphs in the rulebook. Until recently financial services regulation was overseen by the Bank of England with just 30 employees overseeing banks but the number of UK financial supervisors has increased dramatically to about 1,200. In 1980 there was one supervisor per every 11,000 employees in the financial sector and today there is one for every 300.

“I don’t know how you can describe such a framework but you certainly can’t describe it as unregulated, free market business.”

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Related images

  • FCA-FSA-Building-Sky-Contrast-700x450jpg

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (2)

  • Marty

    Imagine if only one or more of the mainstream parties were to have the sense to see this and come off with this statement.
    We do need regulation but it needs different rules for different strands of the FS industry so that all strands can work for the benefit of all concerned and, oh yes, the clients too.
    It does not take rocket science to work this out but it obviously beyond the realms of the current regulatory system. Having the right people doing the job would reduce staff numbers, costs and increase efficiency. Let common sense be the order of the day, with a huge and heavy book to throw at those who obviously rip people off but have a tad more sense about suitable advice is given and suitable sales made. It should not require more paperwork to conduct a compliant piece of ISA business from inception to completion than apply for, and get a shotgun license in the 21st century. Should it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's about time we heard some sense. I would support this 100% as the current system is flawed and constantly fails the UK plc.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Do you see the value in adviser trade bodies?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments