This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM-Cover-Small-210814.jpg

Budget 2014: Govt to block public sector pension transfers to prevent 'mass exit'

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

The Government will ban public sector pension members from transferring out of their defined benefit scheme under proposals announced by Chancellor George Osborne today.

Experts say the move is designed to prevent large numbers of public sector workers ditching their DB scheme in favour of a defined contribution arrangement after Osborne announced a radical overhaul of the UK pensions framework.

The DC reforms, which will take effect from April next year, will allow anyone who is aged 55 or over to take their entire fund as cash.

The Budget documents say: “Having considered this carefully, the Government intends to introduce legislation 
to remove the option to transfer for those in public sector schemes, except in very limited circumstances.

“Whilst the Government would in principle welcome the opportunity to extend greater choice to members of private sector defined benefit pension schemes, it will not do so at the expense of significant damage to the wider economy.

“Funded defined benefit schemes play an important role in funding long-term investment in the UK economy, which the Government does not want to put at risk.

“The Government’s starting point is therefore that, whilst in principle it would like to permit transfers from private sector defined benefit schemes under the new freedoms, it will only consider doing so if the risks and issues around doing so can be shown to be manageable.”

Treasury estimates suggest if just 1 per cent of public sector pension members transferred out it would cost the Exchequer £200m.

MGM Advantage pensions technical director Andy Tully says: “Not being able to transfer is a significant restriction for members of public sector DB members. I imagine the Government will come under pressure from members and unions to provide them with greater flexibility.

“This looks like an attempt to prevent a mass exit of members into the now more flexible DC arrangements.”

Syndaxi Chartered Financial Planners managing director Robert Reid says: “Many high earners, particularly in the health service, will see this as an attack on their ability to take their benefits in a format that they have more confidence in than that provided by the Government.”

The Government is also considering a range of options to restrict transfers out of private sector DB schemes. These include:

  • removing the right of all members of DB schemes to transfer to DC schemes;
  • continuing to allow members of DB schemes to transfer to DC but requiring that any funds which have been transferred are ring-fenced by the receiving pension scheme and subject to the existing DC tax framework;
  • placing a cap on the amount that people in DB schemes can transfer to DC schemes each year;
  • continuing to allow transfers but requiring that any transfer to a DC scheme must be approved by the DB scheme trustees before it can be made;
  • leaving in place the existing flexibility for members of private sector DB schemes to switch to DC schemes.
  • Print
  • Comments (3)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (3)

  • Dominic Thomas

    Oh dear, what a mess... but why are unions and others likely to call for this? rarely can it ever be good advice to move someone from the guarantees offered by DB schemes to something that is investment based.

    Why don't we simply abandon the notion that DB and DC should have the same "rights". DB should be protected, removed from LTA and AA restrictions. That would simplify this very “important role in funding long-term investment in the UK economy, which the Government does not want to put at risk" that DB provides.

    If they really want to simplify pensions, scrap the LTA, bring back the earnings cap and limit tax relief to 20%.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What about death benefits under a DB scheme if no financial dependents? Older children could lose out on a fairly chunky lump sum when the spouse passes?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So they dont trust people after all?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Do you think interest rates will rise before the end of the year?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments