Kensington fined £1.2m over arrears handling

The FSA has hit Kensington Mortgage Company with a £1.225m fine for poor treatment of customers facing mortgage arrears.

The firm is set to pay an additional £1m in redress to customers who were in arrears and charged specific unfair or excessive charges.

The FSA identified a number of serious failings by Kensington which occurred between January 1, 2007 and October 31, 2008 in relation to its mortgage arrears handling processes and in its dealings with customers in arrears.

It found the firm failed to ensure mortgage servicing staff had adequate understanding of treating mortgage arrears customers fairly and concentrated on the repayment of mortgage arrears over a short period of time rather than agreeing an arrangement to pay the arrears based on the customer’s individual circumstances.

The FSA also slammed the firm for applying three charges to customers’ accounts that were unfair or excessive.

Customers were charged a fee for a returned direct debit regardless of how many times the direct debit had already been returned unpaid, an excessive fee for cancelled direct debits, which did not reflect administrative costs and an early repayment charge on mortgage balances, which included arrears fees and charges within that balance.

Kensington also failed to take reasonable care to ensure adequate risk management systems were in place, according to the FSA. The firm’s management information focused on the performance of its mortgage book and the profitability of the business rather than on treating customers fairly.

Kensington qualified for a 30 per cent discount. Without this the fine would have been £1.75m.

Director of enforcement and financial crime Margaret Cole says: “This case should serve as a strong reminder to firms dealing with retail customers, especially customers in a vulnerable position such as those with mortgage arrears, that the FSA will take robust action where it sees that customers are not treated fairly.

“Retail firms which fail in their obligations to customers should expect not only a substantial fine but also that they will have to pay back customers who have been disadvantaged.”

A statement released today by Kensington says: “Kensington confirms we have agreed a settlement with the Financial Services Authority following an investigation into the servicing of mortgage accounts in arrears and certain associated charges during the period 1st January 2007 to 31st October 2008.

“We apologise to all those customers who were impacted during this period and we are working to redress those customers affected as quickly as possible.

“This was a retrospective investigation into arrears processes and our charges were in line with the market at the time. However, we acknowledge that there were certain fees where it was felt that the charge did not accurately reflect the additional work and cost incurred by Kensington. We no longer charge these fees and will be writing to customers who have been affected.”


If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and

Readers' comments (5)

  • Whilst I agree that customers should be treat fairly, the rate the FSA keep dishing out fines thre will soon be no one left to regulate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • About time the FSA looked at the unfair treatment to customers in hardship. They are not the only Lender. Others helped by the Government have used government money to focus more strongly on repossessing properties, when a little help by making arrangements could have seen the customers through their hardshipand everyone would have been better off, including the taxpayer who have bailed these companies out.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Understandable in theory. Every lender at the time worked hard to justify fees and processes based on scant and unclear guidelines. Arrow visits etc were intended to investigate all these things at the time, not 3 years later when we all feel righteous all of a sudden. So most lenders and banks can look forward to retrospective fines - my bank charges £30 for missed DD, others £16. Are they to be fined also? All goes back to the customer eventually in worse rates or more charges.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • About time! as a customer of Kensington I have long felt that I was being ripped off by them. they are an aggressive company who are extremely unwilling to enter into any dialogue with customers who are in difficulty.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have recently paid off a mortgage with Kensington and was charged excessively with charges during the time I had a mortgage with them. They say they will contact all customers about this before May and make refunds ? I wasnt contacted about this. Is it just between 2007-2008 that the charges should be repaid ??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Should there be an RDR consumer awareness campaign?

Current Issue