Fitch downgrades Nationwide's outlook to negative

Fitch Ratings has downgraded Nationwide Building Society’s outlook from stable to negative.

Fitch says it is concerned that the building society has not sufficiently diversified geographically or in terms of business streams and says its asset quality is likely to weaken.

It says that new mortgage business volumes have remained low which is preventing the society from re-pricing its assets as quickly as its liabilities.

Fitch also says operating profits were depressed by a sharp increase in loan impairment charges which relate to a large three year charge for the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and deterioration in the society’s commercial property loan book.

Fitch’s financial institutions team director Andrea Jaehne says: “The Negative Outlook on Nationwide’s Long-term IDR reflects Fitch’s concerns that pressure on operating profit may intensify, throwing into relief the more limited financial flexibility inherent in a building society.

“Fitch believes the society’s asset quality is likely to show modest signs of weakening from its robust position given the agency’s moderate economic outlook for the UK - Nationwide’s main operating market.”

The ratings agency says the economic environment is likely to remain challenging in the UK over the next 12 months. It expects the Bank of England’s base rate to rise in early 2011 and says that as a result, Nationwide’s residential mortgage book could experience further significant stress while pressure could intensify on its commercial book.

Fitch expects the society’s operating profitability to be positive but subdued for 2010 and 2011. The agency says that Nationwide’s financial flexibility to absorb potential charges is limited compared with its ‘AA-’ peers, especially given its restricted ability to raise capital by virtue of its mutual status.

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and

Readers' comments (1)

  • I must say, I find "credit ratings" amusing, particularly alongside both the FSA's, Government's and BoE's recent comments about banks (I'll include Building Societies) being "too big to fail".

    Is it just me, or have we seen a good 18 months of the dog chasing its tail, or the tail chasing the dog depending on how cynical you are?

    First we had a number of banks "get into financial difficulty" so, with the exception of Northern Rock, deals were quickly put together to merge them. Thus making bigger banks!

    Then we had a number of Building Societies "hit the fan" so, again, these were quickly merged, mainly with poor old Nationwide, into larger institutions.

    And now, a short period on, we have every regulator and its dog (pun intended) calling for banks deemed too big to fail to be broken up...

    If it wasn't so rediculous, it would be funny!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Should there be an RDR consumer awareness campaign?

Current Issue