This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM-Cover-Small-210814.jpg
Categories:Investments

Worst-hit funds fell by a quarter amid volatility

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Standard Life’s £40m UK equity recovery fund has been the worst-performing fund across the IMA sectors over the last three months, according to data from Morningstar.

Recent volatility in the markets has affected the short-term performance of a number of funds. Financials have been badly affected through the equity sell-off of the past few weeks, as investors become increasingly risk-averse in response to global events.

Standard Life’s UK equity recovery fund fell by 25.5 per cent between May 24 and August 24. JP Morgan’s £117.7m global financials fund is the second-worst performer, falling by 24.3 per cent over the same period.

Third on the list is the £19.6m CF Richmond core fund, which fell by 23.92 per cent, followed by the £52.5m CF junior oils trust which took a 23.7 per cent hit.

Sector Investment Managers chief executive Angelos Damaskos, who manages the junior oils trust, says: “Medium to smaller-sized companies have suffered the worst during the sell-off because of the risk aversion of investors. The mandate of the fund constrains us to these types of stocks.”

Damaskos (pictured) says he has sold down the fund’s 30 per cent holding in cash and bonds to 14 per cent over the last few months in favour of cheap equities. He expects the stocks will re-rate when markets stabilise.

Standard Life’s £436.5m UK equity unconstrained fund is the fifth-worst performer, down by 23.4 per cent. Manager Ed Legget says global growth expectation has fallen as a result of sovereign risk in Europe and policy issues in the US.

He says: “I have been overweight industrials, which has hurt particularly in the last few weeks. Industrials have de-rated by 25 to 30 per cent over a four-week time period.”

In terms of industrials, he remains committed to the sector. He says: “Corporate capex and emerging markets is a better place to be than developed market consumer over the next two to three years.”

Legget has added 2 per cent to UK banks to make up a 5.5 per cent position over the last couple of months.

He says: “It is riskier not to own banking stocks. They have got the potential to go up a long way if people get a little bit more confident about life.”

Legget says the Standard Life UK equity recovery fund’s focus on recovery stocks and its high exposure to financials has hurt performance over the last four to six weeks. He says: “Recovery stocks are not as popular in times of uncertainty, where people are less optimistic about the prospect of recovery.”

The sixth-worst performer is the Cavendish European fund, followed by the Digital Stars Europe ex UK fund, Jupiter China, JPM Europe smaller companies and the Ignis European growth fund in 10th spot.

A spokeswoman for Cavendish Asset Management says: “Cavendish takes a stock picking approach looking for value in our investments and, as such, the European fund has had some exposure to underperforming markets. We have recently re-aligned our position to reflect these volatile times selling a number of stocks and re-defining our exposure to the emerging economies of Europe.  We continue to believe that there is value in Europe and are confident that the portfolio contains  attractively priced stocks which offer the prospect of outperformance moving forward.”

Premier Wealth Management managing director Adrian Shandley says: “Global financials have underperformed because of the banks but the managers of the other funds must have been taking speculative smaller companies positions.”

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (1)

  • If memory serves, Old Mutual's formerly class-leading Corporate Bond fund fell in value by something like 28% during 2008 and it wasn't the only one in that sector to suffer a degree of loss hitherto undreamt of for funds of that type. Established Western stock markets seem to be a jittery mess ~ they'd probably fall 5% if the Prime Minister made a slightly unfortunate diplomatic gaffe, which is frankly ridiculous. Yet look at what so many Far East and Emerging Market funds are continuing to achieve. Compared with perhaps as little as ten years ago, the investment universe is now upside down, inside out and back to front. And it's changing all the time.

    It is for this reason that I retain a good deal of scepticism about all these fancy risk profiling tools, preferring to fly in the face of the established, FSA-promulgated mantra that past performance is no guide to what the future may hold. I believe that past performance is extremely relevant to what the future may hold. Neil Woodford? Nah, he could completely lose the plot next year, so you can't use his achievements to date as the basis for any recommendations about the future. Rubbish.

    Sure, top performing funds, for a whole range of reasons, can lose their winning form but I'd rather put my money on a great fund continuing to be great than on a crap fund turning round and becoming a great one.

    I prefer to show my clients what the funds I'm recommending have actually done over the past one, two, three, five and ten years, how badly they've fallen in bad years and how strongly they've (hopefully) bounced back the next.

    If a risk profiling tool can't predict with reasonable accuracy (and I don't see how any can) just how a particular fund or portfolio of funds is likely to perform in terms of percentage up, percentage down and percentage back up, then is it really of great practical value?

    Does a client want to be told It could do this, it could do that, it probably won't do that but then again it might or does he want to see actual history?

    But that's just my take on things. Others may disagree.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Should the FCA relax pension transfer qualification requirements?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments