SFO drops Keydata investigation

The Serious Fraud Office has dropped its investigation into Keydata because of a lack of evidence.
The SFO launched its investigation in July 2009 but now says it does not have enough evidence to secure a prosecution over more than £100m worth of assets which disappeared from Keydata products invested in Luxembourg based vehicle SLS Capital.
A statement on the SFO’s website says: “After extensive consideration we concluded that we had insufficient evidence to secure a prosecution in this case.”
Keydata founder Stewart Ford calls the decision a vindication adding it was the “catastrophic intervention” from the FSA which saw the firm go into administration which caused the problems.
The FSA forced the firm into administration after it sold productsas having Isa status which did, leaving the firm with a multi-million pound tax bill.
He says: “The decision is not surprising and it vindicates what I have been saying from the outset. We have no doubt that but for the catastrophic FSA intervention, all Keydata investors in Lifemark and SLS products would have received their promised returns of income and capital.”
The statement adds that the organisation will now focus on trying to trace assets invested with Luxembourg bases company SLS Capital.
Over £100m had been invested with SLS Capital SA which failed to pay income and fees due to Keydata. Since then it has been discovered SLS’s assets were “misappropriated”, the firm has been wound up and a liquidator appointed in Luxembourg.
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing
Most popular
Most commented
Most emailed
-
Positive Solutions reviewing True Potential technology deal
-
Friends Life refuses 500 pension transfers over liberation fears
-
CPD briefing: Understanding the FCA, VAT on advice and anti-avoidance
-
FCA warns investors over paying more to Harlequin
-
Chris Gilchrist: The trouble with Modern Portfolio Theory






Readers' comments (6)
Incompetent Regulators Awards Team | 3 May 2011 3:07 pm
Dear SFO
Can we have an investigation into the FOS please. I think you will find quite a few interesting things going on amongtst the 100,000 yearly complaints!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 3 May 2011 3:12 pm
Shouldn't they have been focussing on the 10% that Stewart Ford's family trust took out of Lifemark? That money may well have been enough to keep Lifemark sovent!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Nemo | 3 May 2011 3:25 pm
How utterly incredible: despite the vast amounts of time and money wasted in complying with the arbitrary edicts of these clown regulators, the FSA in London and the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) in Luxembourg, nobody can say where the money has gone. It’s an absolute farce.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 3 May 2011 4:09 pm
This sounds very strange - Makes you wonder just who they are protecting?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Mr Smug | 3 May 2011 4:35 pm
How convenient.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Robert Morfee | 3 May 2011 4:35 pm
Not surprising. Fraud is not prosecuted in this country well.
It is not generally realised that the principal agencies for investigating and punishing fraud are (a) the Trading Standards officers at the various district councils and (b) the victimms by way of civil litigation. The latter, of course, will become unaffordable if the Governmant's current proposals for proceduaral reforms come to pass.
Robert Morfee
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment