This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Repeat offender Swip leads Bestinvest "dog" funds list

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Bestinvest has revealed that more than £9.2bn was held in underperforming dog funds, although this has dropped from August 2011, when the figure was £23.2bn.

According to Bestinvest’s biannual “Spot the dog” report, 108 funds underperformed the benchmark by 10 per cent or more over three years to December 31, 2011.

The “worst offender” was Scottish Widows Investment Partnership which had both the greatest number of funds and the most in value.

Four Scottish Widows funds made the report, down from six in the previous list, totalling £2.3 billion. It was labelled a “repeat offender” by Bestinvest and included the Scottish Widows global select growth, SWIP UK income, Scottish Widows UK growth and Scottish Widows UK equity income funds.

M&G was revealed as the second “worst offender” with the fund group as the M&G dividend fund entered the dog list.

Schroders was placed third, with the Schroder UK mid 250 fund managed by Andy Brough making the list.

Standard Life was fourth-placed, rising up the table from eleventh, with the Standard Life UK high equity income fund labelled as the culprit.

St James’s Place was pushed up to fifth from 10th place as a result of the St James’s Place international fund.

The report further revealed that £133m had been paid in annual management charges over the past 12 months, accumulating to almost £400m over the three-year period examined.

The IMA UK all companies sector had the most dog funds, with 15 funds.


  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (1)

  • this isn't great as it reduces the amount we tax payers can expect. that apart i am not sure why anyone should be bothered.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Are you prepared to process insistent client business?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments