PSigma lowers fees on discretionary investment management service
PSigma Investment Management is relaunching its discretionary investment management service with lower fees.
Psigma’s Wealth Management Solutions will be re-named Managed Portfolio Service and carry a total expense ratio of 1.75 per cent.
Thomas Becket, chief investment officer of PSigma, says: “PSigma Investment Management has a long track record in managing multi-asset portfolios and recognises that clients do not simply want to outperform inappropriate benchmarks; rather they want to achieve ‘real’ rates of return.
“The standard fee is now 1 per cent, reduced from 1.25 per cent, and there are no commission charges for making changes to the portfolio.”
“We therefore manage MPS with ‘inflation-plus’ benchmarks and targets.”
MPS has four strategic models: cautious, balanced income, balanced and growth, with a maximum weighting towards equities of 30 per cent, 50 per cent, 50 per cent and 65 per cent respectively.
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing
Most popular
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
Co-op halts new business lending
-
Aegon moves ARC platform admin in-house from Novia
-
FCA fines JP Morgan International Bank £3.1m for wealth management failings
-
'Catch us if you can': Small firms to dodge auto-enrolment duties
Most commented
-
Neil Liversidge: Would anyone use 'hard fees' if they didn't have to?
-
Nic Cicutti: Advisers and fund managers need to tackle their charges
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
FCA under pressure to re-think Sipp cap-ad plans
-
Threesixty launches DFM due diligence service
Most emailed
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
Just Retirement to launch long-term care annuity as sales slump
-
'Money Sickness Syndrome' doubles since credit crunch
-
BoI reverses mortgage rate hike for 1,200 borrowers
-
The death of bank advice: more than just the RDR to blame?





