This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

M&G's Leaviss: Should the government cancel £300bn in gilts?

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Jim Leaviss

Jim Leaviss

The Government should consider cancelling more than £300 billion in gilts that the Bank of England has accumulated through its quantitative easing programme, M&G’s Jim Leaviss argues.

Leaviss, manager of the £947.5m M&G gilt & fixed interest income fund, writes on the Bond Vigilantes blog that this move could significantly improve the UK’s financial health and safeguard the country’s AAA rating.

“The Bank holds these gilts on behalf of the Treasury anyway, so the Treasury is effectively paying interest to itself on assets that it bought with ’free’ printed money,” he explains.

“Could we decide that this is a waste of time, that we are unlikely to sell these gilts back to the market in any case, and that we may as well just cancel the gilts we bought for the nation?”

The manager notes that this move would slash the UK’s debt to GDP ratio from 63 per cent to 41 per cent and lower the country’s interest payments from £50 billion a year to just £32 billion. The permanent liquidity injection would allow bolster economic growth and help bring down employment.

“So who would be unhappy with this? No default has taken place (no CDS trigger, no D from the ratings agencies who are only interested in failure to pay private investors), the UK’s public finances become sustainable, the economy gets a boost from the knowledge that the QE cash injected will stay there for the foreseeable future, and a mechanism exists to remove cash from the economy should inflation return,” Leaviss writes.

“Apart from the fact it all feels a bit banana republicy everybody’s a winner.”

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (1)

  • All makes perfect sense but lets see that one get passed. I think not, but great idea.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Are you prepared to process insistent client business?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments