This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Isa managers may fall into platform classification

  • Print
  • Comment


Some Isa managers are likely to be caught up in the definition of a platform because an Isa is classed as a tax wrapper rather than a retail product.

The FSA has altered the definition of a platform to move the emphasis away from admin services, which could spark VAT liabilities. If Isa managers, which are authorised by HM Revenue & Customs, are defined as platforms, they would have to present their products without bias and disclose to the client any fees or commission they accept from third parties. The FSA says Isa managers that distribute funds from more than one provider will need to consider whether they fall within the definition.

It confirmed that Sipp operators do not fall within the definition because a Sipp is a retail investment product.

The paper says: “We consider these to be reasonable requirements, and we have updated the cost-benefit analysis to reflect that the definition captures some Isa managers.”

AJ Bell marketing director Billy Mackay says: “This is information that should be provided under the general spirit of the RDR to improve transparency. If the rules are appropriate for a platform, why would they not be appropriate for a life company or an Isa plan manager?”

  • Print
  • Comment

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Do you see the value in adviser trade bodies?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments