This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+cover+small+180914

Government to appeal High Court solar ruling

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

The Government has decided to appeal against a High Court ruling that its decision to lower solar feed-in tariff payments was illegal.

Energy Minister Greg Barker has confirmed via twitter that it is to appeal against the ruling. The deadline for lodging an appeal is tomorrow at 4pm.

In November, the Government announced it was bringing forward the date for its reduction in feed-in tariffs to December 12, 2011, rather than in April 2012 as previously planned and 11 days before the consultation ended on December 23. Friends of the Earth argued this change with little notice was unlawful.

Under the proposals PV units installed post December 12, 2011 receive reduced FIT payments. For new residential units up to the 4kW band the rate was reduced from 43.3p per kWh to 21.0p per kWh.  The proposals lead to some EIS and VCTs withdrawing offerings or considering changes to product mandates.

Friends of the Earth, which brought the challenge alongside two solar firms, has called on the Government to introduce a plan to reduce solar power payments in line with falling installation costs, rather than prolonging industry uncertainty and jeopardising jobs by pursuing an expensive legal appeal.

Friends of the Earth head of campaigns Andrew Pendleton says: “The Government’s illegal cuts to solar tariff rates have near-crippled an industry and threatened thousands of jobs.

“Trying to appeal the High Court’s ruling is an expensive waste of taxpayers’ money – the court says the Government has no realistic chance of winning, and it will prolong uncertainty among solar companies just when they need reassurance.

“Ministers should accept the High Court’s decision and end business uncertainty and protect jobs with a clear plan to reduce payments from February, in line with falling installation costs.

“The Government must expand the scheme overall – with all the tax revenue the scheme generates, this can be done at no extra cost to bill payers.”

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (3)

  • Go for it Gummint.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • " .........this can be done at no extra cost to bill payers.”

    Except that the bill-payers will also be taxpayers

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where is the FSA?
    The Government has set up an investment opportunity and they have reneged on all aspects of the offering.
    Now who is going to compensate all those who have lost money on this'wonderful idea' as proposed by our Government.
    Or am I dreaming?
    Matron!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Have you heard of cases of advised sales being disguised as execution-only?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments