FSA sets out new rules for funds of alternative investment funds
The FSA has set out new rules which will allow UK retail consumers to invest in funds of hedge funds and other alternative investments authorised in the UK.
The regulator has confirmed the policy of introducing retail-oriented funds of alternative investment funds (FAIFs) into its regulatory regime.
It has built additional consumer protection measures including requirements that FAIF managers carry out initial and ongoing due diligence to determine that the assets in the underlying scheme are held by a third party independently of its manager and the valuation of schemes within a FAIF and the maintenance of a fund’s accounting records are segregated from the scheme’s investment management process.
The new regime will come into effect on March 6.
FSA director retail policy and themes and asset management sector leader Dan Waters says: “Permitting consumers access to a wider range of innovative investment strategies through authorised onshore vehicles will allow more choice and a better opportunity for risk diversification, while maintaining consumer protection through our proportionate rules on the operation of the product.”
The Investment Management Association has welcomed the new rules.
Director of authorised funds and tax Julie Patterson says: “The introduction of FAIFs is good news for product innovation and investor choice because it enables investors to gain access to a wider range of investments. We also welcome the production by the FSA of a factsheet on FAIFs for intermediaries. The new regime will enhance the UK’s position as a domicile for a wider range of funds.”
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing





Readers' comments (1)
Man in Black | 26 Feb 2010 3:59 pm
Sorry, is this a new story? Dan's quote appears to be the same as FSA's press release of 22 Feb 2008.
My understanding was that this was dropped? I'd be very happy if this was not the case, but...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment