Ford hits out at Lifemark loan deal delays

Source: VisMedia
Keydata founder Stewart Ford has hit out at Lifemark provisional administrator Eric Collard of KPMG Luxemburg for failing to progress a loan facility of up to £91m aimied at taking Lifemark out of administration.
Money Marketing revealed in August that Ford (pictured) had arranged the facility with a US bank prepared to offer up to 50 per cent of the value of the Lifemark life settlement portfolio.
Ford’s law firm Withers has now written to Collard over concerns that although Collard was approached with the loan seven weeks ago, no progress has been made on securing the funding.
The letter was sent to Collard yesterday. Copies of the letter, seen by Money Marketing, have also been sent to representatives at the Luxemburg regulator the CSSF, the FSA, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and Investment Management Association chairman Douglas Ferrans and chief executive Richard Saunders.
It has also been sent to Aifa director general Stephen Gay and director Robert Sinclair, Treasury financial secretary Mark Hoban, Treasury select committee chairman Andrew Tyrie, and to Peter Hilton, representing the Lifemark £50,000 plus investors’ group.
Ford argues the loan facility would cover premium payments at risk due to a current lack of liquidity, and would see bondholders and creditors repaid, including the FSCS.
The letter says: “It is therefore a matter of grave disappointment and serious concern to our clients and the many other stakeholders of Lifemark that you have failed to grasp the opportunity to refinance and restructure Lifemark. It would be a scandal that should require a public inquiry if you fail to do so now.”
Ford alleges that Collard approved the signing of a £32,000 refundable fee to allow the investment bank offering the loan to carry out due diligence on September 10. Ford says Collard then decided on September 15 that the loan would only be acceptable if it included an upfront payment of £64m.
Collard was unavailable for comment.
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing
Most popular
Most commented
-
Neil Liversidge: Would anyone use 'hard fees' if they didn't have to?
-
Nic Cicutti: Advisers and fund managers need to tackle their charges
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
Threesixty launches DFM due diligence service
-
The death of bank advice: more than just the RDR to blame?
Most emailed
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
'Money Sickness Syndrome' doubles since credit crunch
-
Threesixty launches DFM due diligence service
-
The death of bank advice: more than just the RDR to blame?
-
Sue Whitbread: The difference between financial advice and financial planning






Readers' comments (3)
Ned Naylor | 29 Sep 2011 11:38 am
Why is anyone surprised at this, regardless of any issues with regard to Stuart Ford, the administrator has no idea what to do about this and is intent on continuing the fee charges regardless of common sense, if this facility could see all those who are in deficit, repaid than KPMG need to just get on with it.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Paul Nash | 29 Sep 2011 5:08 pm
This would end KPMG's 'nice little earner' and explains Mr Collards Procrastination?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
J Johnson | 30 Sep 2011 11:12 am
Please , as a victim, can someone in power take a look at this closely and force whatever action is necessary through so that we can all get our money back. We are so far down the line now I really dont care who arranged it, but if its the best deal lets just vote and take it, and end this saga, and get everyones money back. Why are KPMG not doing this, they seem to be now actually standing in the way, not acting in our interests
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment