Pru exit hits release sector hard
Advisers say Prudential’s exit from the equity-release market is “a hammer blow” to the sector.
MoneyMarketing.co.uk revealed this week that Pru is to stop writing new lifetime mortgage business in the first quarter of 2010. It will continue to service its 14,000 existing customers.
A total of 140 people work on Pru’s lifetime mortgage and 100 jobs could be at risk, although the firm hopes to redeploy as many staff as possible to other parts of the business.
Prudential is the latest in a long line of equity-release providers to withdraw from the market. The move follows Northern Rock, Saffron Building Society, Coventry Building Society and Retirement Plus and Newcastle Building Society which have all suspended lending or withdrawn over recent months while In Retirement Services went into administration earlier in the year.
Prudential’s share of the lifetime mortgage market was around 12 per cent this year and 23 per cent in 2008. It has a total loan book of around £1bn. In 2008, lifetime mortgages made up 3 per cent of total retail sales but in the first nine months of 2009 this had halved to 1.5 per cent.
Since news of Prudential’s exit, Aviva, Hodge, Just Retirement, LV= and Stonehaven have all moved to reassure the market they are committed to remaining in the sector.
Pru says the decision is a result of the up-front capital required to write this type of business, which it believes would be better used in other product areas. It says when it launched into the lifetime sector in 2004, it had planned to securitise its mortgage book but this has not been possible due to the state of the market.
Managing director of retail life and pensions Barry O’Dwyer says he does not expect the securitisation market to recover fully for another five years. He says: “For lifetime mortgages, a significant cash expense is incurred up front in acquiring new business and the payback period on capital employed is long. We have concluded this is not sustainable and that we can deploy cash and capital more effectively across other parts of our business.”
PMS chairman John Malone says: “This is a significant blow. Prudential was a heavyweight and the brand name gave confidence to consumers. It sends a stark message to the sector.”
Independent Equity Release Adviser Alliance spokesman and IFA Dermot Brannigan says: “This really is a big blow. But it is an opportunity for those who are committed to the market.”
The Mortgage Practitioner principal Danny Lovey says: “This is an absolute hammer blow for the market.”
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing





Readers' comments (2)
Simon Chalk | 26 Nov 2009 3:55 pm
This is far from a 'hammer blow' as other pundits have stated. Equity release is a resilient, thriving sector which has survived far more turbulent times than this (does no-one remember pre 1991 & SHIP?!) The Pru is a mighty plc, expected to deliver decent returns to shareholders. Equity Release remains a tiny sector for such a large player. In spite of Pru’s heavy marketing since launch a few years ago, they only amassed £1bn of lending. That small a sum would never hope to deliver any added value for the Pru’s shareholders whereas a smaller niche player like New Life Mortgages for example, would give their right arm for a 12% market share. What does surprise me, is that Pru major in the at/in retirement market, so understand more than most just how huge & important a market this will become. This leaves a vacuum for other providers to be innovative, designing the next generation of equity release products which will be hybrids with annuity & long term care elements. So fear not, equity release is here to stay & the demand will only go one way from here & that is up. Simon Chalk, Equity Release Planner, Mortgage Portfolio, Chesterfield. Derbyshire.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 10 Dec 2009 5:22 pm
Wake up and smell the coffee simon. Which providers are in a position to realistically fill the gap left by Prudential?
Consumer demand may be there now (to a degree) but will they still have the appetite for this product when remaining lenders such as Aviva,JR etc start 'cherry picking' cases and increasing interest rates whilst lowering LTV's. I suspect a lot will depend on Aviva to drive this situation one way or another. hammer blow? more like a ten ton truck!!!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment