This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+cover+small+241014

Bored with all the OMO talk

  • Print
  • Comments (4)

Few people can be as bored of the way that we communicate the open market option, the right to shop around for the best annuity rate in retirement, as I am. That is not to say that the Omo is not critically important it is. However, we should accept that the argument for the Omo has been won and focus instead on whether we, as an industry, are doing enough to motivate pensioners to transform behaviours.

Seven years ago, the arguments for the Omo were new and controversial. The need to gain buy-in from senior politicians, consumer groups and the FSA was real and immediate. Now, few can claim that the argument has not been won. Recently, the Treasury has threatened the industry with legislation if it does not improve Omo take-up while the pension minister and The Pensions Regulator have reminded pensions’ trustees to ensure that scheme members enjoy the benefits of shopping around.

This is a compelling demonstration that this issue is understood by all senior policymakers and that they intend that the situation changes. The battle must now be with changing the way that people at retirement behave. Despite many years of significant media attention, Omo take-up is still pitifully low, with only one in three shopping around.

Consider the fact that only 12 per cent of pensioners currently take an enhanced annuity for health or lifestyle reasons, yet more than 40 per cent could do so and may be able to enjoy up to 30 per cent extra retirement income for life.

The industry has a key role in transforming consumer behaviours. First, we have to recognise that the words financial services have the ability to scare and bore consumers at the same time. Yet when we communicate the Omo, we tend to focus on gloomy scenarios and the perils of not shopping around. Does this not reinforce consumer concerns when perhaps we should start to motivate them by the many benefits that pensioners can enjoy by enjoying greater income in retirement?

We must also remove barriers to take-up in the whole annuity sales process by putting the consumer first and remove unnecessary complexity and boredom. Words such as open market option and annuities which are technical and hard to understand can only reinforce concern about engagement with the industry on these issues. This requires industry innovation and seeking to drag annuity purchasing into the 21st Century.

Partnership’s online enhanced annuity platform means that an adviser and consumer need only answer 10-12 simple health or lifestyle questions rather than ploughing through 20 pages asking similar questions. The battle for the arguments has been won, the industry must now transform consumer behaviours.

Andrew Megson is the managing director at Partnership

  • Print
  • Comments (4)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (4)

  • As I've said before, the FSA's Money Made Clear booklet is very good and it mentions in several places the value of seeing an IFA. The trouble is that it isn't being read by nearly enough people, many of whom are probably blue collar workers for whom the whole subject is intimidating. It isn't even mandatory for life offices to include one of these booklets with their retirement packs (I checked with the FSA), some of which are ludicrously voluminous. Why ever not?

    What is needed (and I've said this before too) is for all retirement packs to include (compulsorily) a single, brightly coloured, laminated A4 sheet which proclaims the core message in simple and absolutely unequivocal terms ~ If you want to get the most out of your retirement fund/s, SEE AN IFA. Why isn't the FSA acting on this suggestion?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Seven years ago, the arguments for the Omo were new and controversial."

    Maybe to you they were new, Andrew. I was first published on the subject in Pensions World in about 1985.

    The fact remains that most ABI members do not want the OMO promoted because they write bucketloads of annuity business on uncompetitive rates.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Treat the voter fairly (TVF), the new government initiative.
    Increase the Trivial pension limit against the lifetime allowance from 1% to 3%. Funds of more than 3% of LTA will make it worth the clients actually getting advice on the OMO rather than self finding the best OMO which people are often too afraid to do without help.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I just can't understand why the regulator or government make such a fuss still. People will either exercise their h OMO or not . People need to understand all the options, its not difficult, get OMO quotes to see if you get a better annuity if you dont then stick where you are, see if you qualify for enhanced rates with illness. Its not all just about h OMO. if the government want to put its money where its mouth is it should advertise so that everyone that has a private pension checks out tHe OMO option and enhanded OMO option

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Should Sesame unwind the 'pay to play' deals it set up as part of its restricted advice panel?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments