This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+Cover+small+181214
Categories:Pensions

Advisers can take 35% of first year contributions says FSA

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Advisers will be able to take consultancy charging remuneration of up to 35 per cent of first year’s contributions, the FSA has confirmed.

That figure, cited in the FSA’s policy statement 10/10, published today, is considerably higher than those considered acceptable to savers by many industry experts.
The FSA policy statement says: “Respondents quoted commission rates in the range of 10 to 35 per cent of the first year’s GPP contributions. We see no reason why consultancy charges at these levels cannot be deducted from the first year’s contributions to a GPP. Consultancy charges will be transparent and enable employers to negotiate them, if they wish, including spreading them over time.”
Steven Cameron, head of business regulation at Aegon says: “The FSA is making it clear that advisers will have to think about ways of taking commission without up front charges to members. The ban on factoring basically means you can’t have it all on day one. This could mean agreeing to be paid a level that will be acceptable to scheme members, which could be 10 per cent of the first two years’ contributions.”

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Am I missing something here? Aren't we effectively back to front end loaded contracts?

    Currently, under my commission arrangements on GPPS, costs are spread without any front end load to the client. The commission risk if contributions cease early is mine.

    How can this be TCF?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

AXA Wealth


Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Two years on from the RDR, do you think consumers are better off as a result?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments