This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

MM leader: MAS advert misleads and confuses public

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

“Our advice is independent and unbiased. Oh, and it’s free. How is that for a breath of fresh air?”

So says an infuriating new national TV advert for the Government’s Money Advice Service.

The service, paid for by an annual levy on the financial services industry, which this year cost £43.7m, aims to offer unregulated information to consumers as a starting point to better understand their financial position.

The Government made a big mistake in branding the service as “advice”. If you are offering advice, you must be prepared to take responsibility for the advice on offer yet, as a lengthy disclaimer on the MAS website makes clear, it takes no such responsibility.

This misuse of the word advice has created confusion at a time when the FSA says it is striving for clarity of advice definitions through the retail distribution review.

The new advertising campaign goes further in muddying the waters for consumers.

The words independent and unbiased have become synonymous with a distinct type of advice that IFAs are proud to offer their clients. The word “independent” can only be used by advisers who abide by specific regulatory rules which will become stricter after 2012. The organisation formerly known as IFA Promotion has for some time marketed itself to consumers under the Unbiased brand.

To suggest this advice is free is technically incorrect, the £43.7m levy is inevitably passed on to all consumers of financial products, and promotes a message which contradicts the FSA’s RDR aim of ensuring consumers are aware that advice should be valued and paid for.

The phrase “breath of fresh air” can easily be read as a dig at other forms of paid-for advice.

The MAS’s marketing campaign has also done it no favours with some IFAs who have been led to believe it will compete with the services they offer. A quick examination of the MAS website suggests the service is not looking to step on the toes of IFAs.

Creating more financially literate consumers is a worthy goal worth paying for, although some of the levy should be funded by the taxpayer due to the potential positive social effects of the service.

However, rather than educating, the current MAS advertising campaign clumsily guides consumers away from the truth that good advice is a valuable commodity worth paying for.

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (2)

  • My main beef about the MAS is being forced to pay towards the cost of it without, to the best of my knowledge, the industry in general and the IFA sector in particular, having been consulted about its creation, style of presentation, objectives and modus operandi.

    If all it really offers is guidance, then surely this could be achieved vastly more simply and cost-effectively by way of decision trees. Simple? Cost-effective? Not, it seems, words in the FSA's vocabulary. But then it's all being done with other peoples' money, the supply of which is blithely deemed to be inexhaustible, so what the hell?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • if i am funding the MAS, albeit indirectly, then i should have a say in how it is promoted. if it is advertised as "independent" then you cannot give that advice without qualifications and industry experience, who are listening to the calls and providing the ongoing T & C?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Do you see the value in adviser trade bodies?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments