This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Ashcourt Rowan defends in-house payment structure

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Ashcourt Rowan Financial Planning has defended its payment structure which offers advisers 2 per cent commission for recommending its in-house discretionary service to clients.

The maximum adviser charge for the discretionary service is 3 per cent and Ashcourt Asset Management pays the 2 per cent “referral fee” to advisers on top.

The firm says it has offered the payment for a number of years. Last year, it added an adviser scorecard as part of a move to a “performance-based culture”.

The scorecard holds advisers to account for all the business they write against eight key objectives, including new business revenue targets based on fees paid by providers to advisers as well as client fees.

Ashcourt Rowan director of financial planning Chris Williams says: “Our overall service is best when our discretionary service works in conjunction with our financial planning service but we are not incentivising our advisers to recommend internal funds. It is about making sure there is a level playing field for our advisers with the discretionary service and the external market.

“It is not more than they would be able to get by recommending an external product or provider and getting 5 or 6 per cent.”

Williams says the company is likely to remain independent after the RDR rather than moving to a restricted model but it has not made a final decision yet.

PageRussell chartered financial planner Tim Page says: “I would be interested in what the FSA would say to Ashcourt Rowan about how it is going to have this structure and maintain independent status after the RDR.”

Philip J Milton & Company managing director Philip Milton says: “Firms have to cover their costs and incentivise advisers but this seems quite a chunky charge that will filter down to the client.”

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (1)

  • I am an ex CIFA Adviser still trying to work out what was really going on before we were offloaded as quickly as possible to AR. We were told that AR were specifically chosen by Co-op because of their close fit in reflecting 'ethical' background of the Co-op. I now realise that they were both using a different definition of the word 'ethical' than I was used to. I hope all concerned may come to regret their weasel words.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


How do you plan to vote at the general election?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments