This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+271114+Cover+Small
Categories:Pensions,Politics

Equitable Life redress ruling 'unfair'

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

The Government’s decision not to compensate Equitable Life members who annuitised before 1992 was unfair and wrong, according to and Pensions select committee member Andrew Bingham.

In June, the Government began distributing £1.5bn of compensation to those who annuitised after 1992. It chose the cut-off date because before then there was no maladministration in the firm which, if spotted by the regulator, could have affected policyholders’ investment decisions.

But speaking to Money Marketing at the Conservative Party conference last week, High Peak MP Bingham said the 10,000 people who annuitised before the cut-off date should have been included.

He said: “When the vote came through the House of Commons I voted against the Government because I thought the pre-1992 annuitants should have been entitled to compensation. There were a few of us who thought the same, but not enough.

“Even though their losses were not the result of regulatory failure, I think it was unfair and wrong to exclude them. A lot of Equitable Life policyholders feel the Government’s solution is not as they would wish.”

Under the compensation scheme, £620m will go to 37,000 with-profits investors compensating them for relative losses. Two-thirds of the money is expected to be paid out by 2015.

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (2)

  • But surely, those pre-1992 annuitants will have benefited from the extended over paymentson the bonus rates?

    So they have gained on a being over paid on Bonus rates (resulting in a higher fund value) - and so being compensated will mean they will benefit twice and only lose out once (on annuity reductions)?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh but Henry (as the Ad goes)

    They don't pay Commission!

    They all deserve what they (don't) get!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

AXA Wealth

The Budget: What do people really know?


Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Are you happy with the outcome on the Budget guidance adviser levy?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments